Orange County NC Website
{ <br /> 1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> Action Agenda <br /> item No. _TY_A <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: December 4,1995 <br /> SUBJECT: Contract Approval;Jail/Courthouse Project <br /> DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING AND Public Hearing:Yes: No: XX <br /> CENTRAL SERVICES Budget Amendment Reqd? NoXX <br /> ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> Contract PAM JONES, ext.2650 <br /> Telephone Number- <br /> Hillsborough 732-8181 <br /> Chapel Hill 967-9251 <br /> Mebane 227-2031 <br /> Durham 688-7331 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider approving a contract with Trafalgar House Construction Company for construction <br /> of the Jail/Courthouse project. <br /> BACKGROUND: Information presented to the Board on September 5 as the amount of bid award for the <br /> Jail/Courthouse Project ($3,408,642, negotiated from $3,765,000) included some items which required <br /> approval from outside sources;for example the Historic District Commission and the project engineer. While <br /> the necessary approvals have now been obtained,the final contract amount($3,482,968)is more than that <br /> which was previously awarded. The$74,326 increase is in large part attributed to two items: <br /> 1 The alternative roof design was reviewed by the Hillsborough Historic District and while they <br /> ultimately did approve an altemative roof design, it was different than the one suggested. <br /> Their approved version yielded a lesser credit than what was cited during the September 5 <br /> presentation; and <br /> 2 A pre-cast planking system suggested by the contractor in the jail construction was <br /> considered inadequate by the project engineer and was not allowed. <br /> Please note that although the contract was negotiated from $3,765,000 to $3,482,968 neither the <br /> functionality nor quality of this project has been jeopardized. In addition to the two items listed <br /> above, other sources of negotiation which yielded significant credits include: Re-negotiation by the <br /> contractor with the subcontractors; revising backfill material and design of the berm vs. concrete <br /> retaining walls to the north of the project; revised lighting requirements (which resulted in a more <br /> energy efficient lighting design); and modifying the hot water capacity and electrical panel capacity <br /> to meet the needs of the addition, but not necessarily future expansion (chances for expansion within <br /> this facility are extremely limited anyway). <br /> The Board is requested to approve the final contract with Trafalgar House at the$3,482,968 amount. You may <br /> recall that we had included in the funding of this project approximately $299,000 for contingency. The <br /> increased contract amount would reduce the contingency to approximately$225,000. Trafalgar House has <br /> indicated that they will continue to pursue cost saving measures and pass the savings on to the County,which <br /> would serve to off set any necessary change orders and minimize the use of the project contingency money. <br />