Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-04-1995 - VIII-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 12-04-95 - Work Session - Late
>
Agenda - 12-04-1995 - VIII-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2015 11:25:35 AM
Creation date
1/13/2015 11:25:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-E
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951204
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 <br /> tested to its limit by the size of the <br /> development. <br /> Jobsis asked who would maintain the water lines <br /> and the response was the utility company. <br /> The developer noted improvements that have been <br /> made in the Plan to protect the view along the <br /> road. <br /> Brown asked if the landscape designer and <br /> developer was aware if the Stoney Creek Planning <br /> Group's work and the flexible development <br /> proposal as well as recommendations by Randall <br /> Arendt. The applicant responded that they felt as <br /> if they had the beginning of extensive open space <br /> development for the area. <br /> Howie expressed appreciation for the improvements <br /> made by the developer over the Concept Plan. <br /> Waddell agreed. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> Preliminary Plan for University Manor - Phase I <br /> with the Resolution of Approval (an attachment to <br /> these minutes on pages ) . <br /> MOTION: Jobsis moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff with the Resolution of Approval. <br /> Seconded by Barrows. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed - Brown - would prefer that the <br /> developer consider the Stoney Creek Plan and <br /> flexible development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.