Orange County NC Website
i <br /> a <br /> M1,• <br /> APPENDIX <br /> The calculation of benefits for the family without a worker is relatively straightforward. <br /> We assume that the family has no earnings or income and therefore receives the <br /> maximum amount of AFDC. Since AFDC is included as income in the calculation of <br /> food stamp benefits, a family receiving the maximum amount of AFDC will receive $45 <br /> less each month in food stamps than the maximum. We assume that the family does not <br /> qualify for any other deductions besides the food stamp standard deduction. <br /> Earned income is equal to $5.25 an hour multiplied by 40 hours each week multiplied by <br /> 52 weeks, or$10,920 each year. <br /> The Federal EITC is the maximum in 1994 for families with two children earning under <br /> $11,000 a year in wages and salaries, or$2528. Federal payroll taxes are equal to 7.65 <br /> percent of wages, or$835. <br /> State income taxes are equal to 6 percent of income after subtracting a standard deduction <br /> h of$4400 for a head of household and $6000 for three personal exemptions. The tax is <br /> therefore 6 percent of$520, or $31. In 1995 and 1996, this family will have no State <br /> income tax liability under changes enacted by the General Assembly. <br /> A local Blue Cross HMO charges about twice as much for a parent and child as for an <br /> individual worker alone. That ratio was applied to the Medicaid benefit of$3312 to <br /> compute the Medicaid benefit for the children and the health insurance cost for the adult. <br /> Food stamp benefits for the working family are computed on the basis of the earned <br /> income and food stamp standard deduction alone. No other income or deductions (for <br /> dependent care, etc) was included. <br /> The sales tax on food was 6 percent of the difference in$1644 in food stamp amounts <br /> t between the family without a worker and the family with a worker. <br /> a; <br /> Tanner, Michael, Stephen Moore,and David Hartman,The Work vs. Welfare Trade-Off: An Analysis of <br /> the Total Level of Welfare Benefits by State,Cato Institute: September 1995. <br /> 2 US Government Accounting Office,Low-Income Families: Comparison of Incomes of AFDC and <br /> Working Families,January 1995. <br /> ' Walden, Michael,The Impact of the Expanded Earned Income Tax Credit on Work Incentives for <br /> Welfare Recipients in North Carolina. September 1994. <br /> °The Cato report acknowledges that not all recipients receive all benefits. Pages 28 and 30 of their report <br /> describe a package of AFDC, Medicaid and food stamps as more typical. <br /> 5 Castillo, Monica D., US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, A Profile of the Working Poor, <br /> 1993.July 1995. <br /> G US General Accounting Office,op cit. <br /> Tanner and Moore,"Why Welfare Pays", Wall Street Journal, September 28, 1995,p. A20. <br /> " Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota,New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin have state EITCs. <br />