Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-27-1995 - C-6
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 11-27-95
>
Agenda - 11-27-1995 - C-6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2015 4:20:53 PM
Creation date
1/12/2015 4:18:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/27/1995
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-6
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951127
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
176 <br /> • May, 19% - A proposal to create an Open Space Development Area Land Use Plan <br /> category and zoning district is presented at public hearing. The proposal also includes its <br /> application to the University Station property. <br /> • June, 1994-A proposal to rezone the remaining portion of the county to require two-acre <br /> minimum lot sizes is presented at public hearing. Citizen comment is also requested on the <br /> desirability of clustering, mandatory open space requirements, and density bonuses. <br /> • September, 1994 - October, 1995 - The Planning Board reviews all materials/evidence <br /> received,including the Rural Character Study Committee recommendations(January, 1993), <br /> and prepares recommendation. <br /> The Planning Staff has reviewed the material produced and/or received, including comments <br /> provided by citizens through township meetings and public hearings. While a variety of <br /> approaches and options exist,the three basic approaches which have been recommended to date <br /> include: <br /> • The Rural Character Study Committee recommendations; <br /> • The "Status Quo"; and <br /> • A "Cluster Option" incorporating a mandatory 50% open space requirement and density <br /> limits based on the carrying capacity of the soils. <br /> SUMMARY OF STAFF PROPOSAL: In an effort to focus the discussion and "balance" the <br /> many interests expressed to date, the Planning Staff has prepared this proposal which consists <br /> of three parts. The first section contains "Goals and Action Strategies" (as recommended by the <br /> Rural Character Study Committee). The second section contains a "Flexible Development" <br /> option which contains the following provisions: <br /> • The existing one-acre minimum lot size requirement would be retained. <br /> • The provision of open space would be optional, however, a developer would be required <br /> to submit two concept plans-one for a conventional subdivision and another for a"flexible" <br /> or open space subdivision. <br /> • If a Flexible Development option is chosen, at least one-third(33%) of the land within a <br /> subdivision must be preserved as open space which may be preserved through: <br /> • An"estate lot"approach where all land is subdivided into lots four(4)acres or greater <br /> in size, building limits(50%)are established for each lot, and the open space outside <br /> such limits is preserved through restrictive covenants and/or conservation easements; <br /> or <br /> • A "conservation" approach where all land is subdivided into lots, and open space is <br /> preserved through the use of conservation easements held by the County or a land <br /> conservancy; or <br /> • A "cluster" approach where lot sizes are reduced and the land saved through such <br /> reductions is dedicated to the County or a land conservancy, or owned and maintained <br /> by a homeowners' association; or <br /> • A "village" or modified cluster approach where dwelling units are clustered around a <br /> village green and supporting shops, and the village is surrounded by open space; or <br /> • Some combination of the above, including the use of "density averaging" to allow <br /> flexibility in areas where two-acre minimum lot size requirements exist. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.