Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> Rosemond: An options deserve consideration as incentives/disincentives. Public/private roads a <br /> powerful incentive.Do not support water/sewer extension beyond areas currently served. <br /> Howie: Like incentives for 33%and above Prefer roads and fee waivers for 50%open space <br /> and up. No benefit to extending water and sewer - individual systems okay. Questions <br /> about staff approvaL <br /> Hoecke: Need whole range of incentives to kick in gradually. Don't use water/sewer, lack of <br /> control in intervening areas. Like private vs. public roads. <br /> Allison: Like density bonuses.Start incentives at 4090,allow roads and fee waivers at 50%and <br /> up. Agree with previous water/sewer comments. <br /> Katz: Incentives must be large enough to make it happen. Disincentives for old ways, <br /> incentives for the new. Like density disincentive - don't think it's dowrizoning Like <br /> roads. start substantial incentives at 50%plus.Like low-cost housing incentives. Concern <br /> about water/sewer, need well-supervised community systems. <br /> Barrows: Provide density bonuses for 50% open space plus. Like roads and staff approval, but <br /> cutoff at certain level.Avoid off-site nitrification fields-prefer on-site unless do something <br /> different. <br /> Brown: Not in favor of density bonuses, prefer disincentives. Prefer no bonuses or incentives <br /> until 50%open space plus.Private roads need thought.Do not favor staff approval,but <br /> favor approving open-space plans in one meeting. Not in favor of fee waivers/relaxed <br /> standards except in high open space cases. Favor on-site systems for conventionaL If <br /> water/sewer, require open space. <br /> Walters: Can't support downzomng Open to paved roads in conventional developments. Need to <br /> stagger density bonuses. Provide some incentive at 33%, but don't stop from doing <br /> more. <br /> Jobsis: Open space not automatically a good thing. Disincentives make it costly option. Like <br /> density bonuses,don't take away. Road preferences okay, but need more info. Like <br /> staff approval as incentive. Escalating scale for incentives with open space okay. <br /> Judiciously use water/sewer, if clusters happen near cities, water/sewer reasonable <br /> Waddell: Favor some density bonuses at 33%,but must do 66%plus to get full scope Use <br /> sliding scale for incentives.Like incentives for decreasing road cost.Prefer staff approval <br /> at 50-66% open space only. Like gradation for fee waivers - none at 66%. Allow <br /> water/sewer, development will cost less if lines exist. Perhaps have County help provide <br /> water/sewer if 66% open space plus. Support affordable housing bonus. Allow relaxed <br /> standards at higher open space percentages. <br /> 3 <br />