Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
65 <br /> 2. Conservation Option: For lots created as part of <br /> a conservation development, the minimum lot <br /> area, lot width, and setback requirements as <br /> specified in Article 4.1.2 of the Orange County <br /> Zoning Ordinance shall apply except as permitted <br /> ConServneton d <br /> below. ea:mwc <br /> • For each conservation lot, buildable and p <br /> conservation areas must be defined. The <br /> buildable area must be of sufficient size <br /> to accommodate a single-family detached Total <br /> 33 <br /> dwelling and customary accessory uses, Pb-d <br /> including, but not limited to, storage ; <br /> buildings and garages, swimming pools, <br /> lawns, and driveways. ; <br /> • The conservation area of each lot; e.g., <br /> Buildable <br /> that portion of the lot to be preserved as or*" <br /> open space, shall include designated <br /> Primary and/or Secondary Conservation _ <br /> Areas. s` na#o # <br /> %`:`<:'>.s ::':::::::: :<::::::.:<:::::::<:•::. ': Under the conservation option, at least 33% of the <br /> i.. subdivision area is preserved as open space through <br /> a conservation easement applied to individual lots. <br /> Joyner Comment: This provision should be added to the "Estate Lot Option" to resolve the <br /> concern about making perk sites unusable. <br /> • 'L.::::.i}:'.i'.:C{'.: :' .%:.:i:;;:.i:tiniiiiiiiiii':tiiiiiii:iiii::::iiiiiiiiiiiii::�.i:::ip.•:w. vq..:::.�.::::.�..:::::.: .:::::.:..::.:::::n:..�..�:.:::::::::::::.�:::::w::..::.:::::.� <br /> ssvcuax....:: >:.; h' >sfititeici <vuic :ftiiyati;a #eri :a <br /> :<: t�et.>:...... .................... <br /> :............................................................ .::::.::::::.:::.::::::::::.1 .:: .:::::::::::: :::x::.............. .::.::::.::.. <br /> cj x:vac...... ...::..:: 1::...... :. a: ::1 <br /> :...::.:....:::::::..::.::::..: :.:..::.:::::.n.::::::. . :. ..�.�. �.: •:iL. ......::::.::•::: ::::.. <br /> ::........r t1 ..- <br /> .:::::::::::.::.... �.:::::::::::::::.::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.: .::.::::::::::...:::::.:.::.:................. <br /> ..::.......................................................................................................................................... ......::..............:::::::: 1"... <br /> Joyner Comment: The above language should be taken as advice, not judgment. This is the <br /> type of development desired, so the wording should be in the form of commentary, not <br /> regulatory. <br /> • Only the conservation area designated for each lot may be counted toward meeting the thirty-three <br /> Percent open space requ►rement. �EtO� #6:1fi411 ?�.#:#1�:?�:�E �f:': : <br /> Arendt Comment: Too low, especially if it includes some Primary Conservation Areas. <br /> Joyner Comment:Need to rethink this because, as worded, provision does not permit parks, <br /> etc. to be counted as open space. <br /> • Provided the arrangement, design, and shape of conservation lots is such that lots provide <br /> satisfactory and desirable sites for building; contribute to the preservation of designated Primary <br /> and/or Secondary Conservation Areas; and satisfy all building/conservation area standards, <br /> conservation lots may platted in accordance with following standards: <br /> Flexible Development 11 <br />