Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 11-01-95
>
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2015 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
1/8/2015 4:21:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-B
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951101
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
56 <br /> • Farmland; <br /> • Slopes of 15% to 25%; <br /> • Other historic and/or archaeological sites; <br /> • Public and/or private recreation areas and facilities; <br /> • Public and/or private infrastructure improvements; and/or <br /> • Scenic views of preserved features and/or landscape buffers. <br /> Secondary Conservation Areas may be comprised of any of the remaining open space uses <br /> identified above.When permitted,such uses may provide the remaining land area needed to satisfy <br /> the thirty-three percent (33%) open space requirement. <br /> d. When lots and access streets are laid out, they must be located so that those portions of the site <br /> proposed for disturbance and/or construction avoid Primary and Secondary Conservation Areas. <br /> Where access streets and/or utilities are required to pass through or by such areas so as to link <br /> one buildable portion of a site with another, they must be located and/or constructed so as to have <br /> no adverse impacts on Primary and Secondary Conservation Areas. <br /> Continent: The distinction between 'Primary' and "Secondary' Conservation Areas cited above is based <br /> generally on the system advocated by Randall Arendt in the Sussex County,Delaware open space <br /> design guidebook A similar methodology was used by the University Station Planning Group in <br /> attempting to define open space areas. <br /> Arendt's approach is to set aside Primary Conservation Areas first, since such features are <br /> considered unbuildable for legal or practical reasons. In addition to wetlands and floodplains,he <br /> suggests that the following features be included as part of designated Primary Conservation Areas: <br /> • Slopes of greater than 25%; <br /> • State-listed habitats of threatened or endangered species, and/or <br /> • National Register sites (improved or renovated with federal funding) and locally <br /> designated historic districts. <br /> Slopes of 15% to 25%, natural areas, wildlife habitats and corridors, and historic and <br /> archaeological sites would thus be classified as Secondary Conservation Areas. <br /> One difference between the Arendt approach and the Flexible Development proposal is that all <br /> habitats and corridors as identified in the Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats have <br /> been categorized as Primary Conservation Areas. Of 64 sites identified in the Inventory only eight <br /> contain threatened or endangered species. The inclusion of all sites as Primary Conservation Areas <br /> recognizes the limited number of such features as well as their diversity and significance. <br /> Another difference involves historic and archaeological sites. Recent inventories have identified <br /> 665 historic sites, including six National Register sites and 41 National Register study list sites. <br /> Of the study list sites, three are potential historic districts, and one is an archaeological site. No <br /> local historic district or landmark designations have been made. The inclusion of such sites as <br /> Primary Conservation Areas recognizes their existing or potential significance. <br /> The inclusion of scenic views of preserved features,e.g.,farmland and water bodies, as well as <br /> landscape buffers to screen the view of development from public roads is based on Arendt's <br /> approach to defining Secondary Conservation Areas. <br /> 3. Ownership of Open Space. Open space within a Flexible Development may be owned and/or administered <br /> by any of the following methods,either individually or in combination.All open space shall be permanently <br /> restricted from further subdivision. <br /> Flexible Development 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.