Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 11-01-95
>
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2015 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
1/8/2015 4:21:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-B
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951101
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
119 <br /> it must have paved roads. The only way to have <br /> private roads would be if the developer does an <br /> open space development. It becomes a 'pocketbook' <br /> issue. He noted that there would be a lot of <br /> comment on such a statement, but, it is a <br /> different kind of disincentive that deals with <br /> basic road standards as opposed to taking away <br /> density. <br /> Collins continued with an incentive that he <br /> indicated would also be controversial; expedited <br /> review. He noted that the Planning Board as well <br /> as the Board of Commissioners, may take issue <br /> with this. The Rural Character Study Committee <br /> also discussed expedited review. Collins gave <br /> the example - if you have a 100-lot subdivision <br /> and you do an open space development and forget <br /> about conventional, the only people you have to <br /> deal with are Staff. <br /> Another incentive that has been discussed a lot <br /> is fee waivers which could include several things <br /> such as application fees for subdivision <br /> approval. If an open space development is done, <br /> major subdivision fees could be waived. Collins <br /> noted that he could not address Environmental <br /> Health fees and indications have been that those <br /> fees are the "big ticket items" particularly when <br /> having perc tests on so many lots. <br /> The Board of Commissioners have also asked that <br /> the dedication, payment-in-lieu provisions <br /> relating to recreation sites be reviewed. In <br /> particular, the Board has asked that the <br /> standards that are the starting point for the <br /> amount of land that must be dedicated. The land <br /> and the standards then determine the amounts of <br /> the payment-in-lieu. These are very low. The <br /> funds collected during the last 8 to 10 years <br /> will not come close to the amount that would be <br /> needed to purchase a 25-acre community park site. <br /> They have asked that the standards be reviewed to <br /> determine whether open space should be factored <br /> in. This would cause a dramatic increase in the <br /> payments-in-lieu. Thus, some people might then <br /> find it desirable to do an open space development <br /> and bypass the necessity of making fairly high <br /> payments-in-lieu. This is another financial <br /> incentive. <br /> There was also discussion about relaxed <br /> standards. One of those standards could relate <br /> to roads; it would be a real incentive if private <br /> roads are allowed in open space subdivisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.