Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 11-01-95
>
Agenda - 11-01-1995 - X-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2015 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
1/8/2015 4:21:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-B
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951101
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
106 <br /> Concept Plan; its general compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan, <br /> and other applicable codes and ordinances;and the concerns of citizens expressed at the Public Information <br /> Meeting. If the Planning Department fails to prepare a report to the Planning Board within the specified <br /> time period, or extension thereof, the Concept Plan is recommended without conditions. <br /> Comment ........................ A.......................... <br /> .- W a <br /> . .. . .... . ... <br /> W <br /> . .. ..... <br /> 4 <br /> Und "i <br /> ..... .. ... <br /> -Y <br /> i" W.0 <br /> .............. ...... <br /> . . ............ ... <br /> .......... <br /> N M <br /> .............. <br /> Joyner Comment: So this is an exchange? I guess we're throwing out the whole idea of expedited <br /> review? <br /> e. Planning Board Review and Approval Procedures: After receiving the Planning Department's report or, <br /> if applicable, the expiration of the time period prescribed in Section III-D-1-b, the Planning Board shall <br /> consider the Concept Plan, including both the Conventional Development Option and the Flexible <br /> Development Option, and take action on the proposals. The Planning Board shall base its action on its <br /> findings as to the conformity of the proposals with all applicable regulations and shall: <br /> • Approve the Development Options; <br /> • Approve the Development Options subject to conditions; or <br /> • Deny the Development Options. <br /> If the Planning Board approves the Development Options either with or without conditions, it shall <br /> recommend to the subdivider which Development Option that it considers most appropriate, based on the <br /> characteristics of the site, its suitability for development, and the intent of the Flexible Development <br /> standards as specified in Section IV-B-10-A. The Planning Board's recommendation shall be non-binding <br /> on the subdivider. <br /> If the Planning Board approves the Development Options subject to conditions, such conditions shall be <br /> reasonable and shall seek to insure compliance with applicable regulations. If the Planning Board approves <br /> with conditions or denies the Development Options,the reasons for such decision shall be stated in writing <br /> to the applicant and entered into the minutes of the meeting at which such action was taken. <br /> at which the Planning <br /> The Planning Board shall <br /> Department's report is submitted to it or within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant. <br /> If the Planning Board fails to take action within the specified time period, or extension thereof, the <br /> Planning Board shall be deemed to recommend approval of the Concept Plan Development Options without <br /> conditions. <br /> Joyner Comment:Citizens meeting should be within a minimum of 10 days after application receipt. <br /> Then, Planning Board acts within 90 days after citizen meeting...then start survey and perks...then <br /> apply for preliminary approval. <br /> Comment.- The only difference between the above provisions and those currently in effect is the <br /> addition of the requirement that the Planning Board approve both the Conventional <br /> Development Option and the Flexible Development Option. Another addition is the <br /> requirement that the Planning Board recommend to the subdivider which Development <br /> Option to pursue. This approach is based on a similar concept contained in the Grafton, <br /> Massachusetts Flexible Development Bylaws. <br /> Flexible Development 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.