|
105
<br /> ...:{.i:{•ii'�i••:i :::i:.:.i:::;•i::.i:i;!tiii:•;{.::.::.?•i:?•iii;.i:?:is�'i:.::i:{•i;.;.;.:4:}i.:.:.:':i:.:?;;•;.;.i;•;•;{.: •i:i:::ti:;•i:iv;:�:;•i;:•ii:i"::::::. .:.::.::::.:::::.:..:::.:::::.::.::::::.::..:.................
<br /> • ::::< . . ::
<br /> :.::::.::::.: Jay,
<br /> :..•:.v ::::::::::.:.i::.r.• ;;..... ......................�:::::::.:::..:::.::::::::............:ii;.•'.•,'.•,.•,:�•,'.:,..,'.•,::ii:::i':i:::::i:i::i:'..iii iiiX::iiiiiiiiiJiiiiiiii:�i:•+ ::�t.
<br /> :.i:i�::......y::.�:•n':ii'::.:::::.vi:ii::i',','y..i,:,:;.....�.fy..:;i��iT,.::y••i:i�i�}-},:�.}r.i;:iiii:::i::•.;.y;.
<br /> • !SN,f3X '� t ;; 6SS@SL:::: (�.:.:.:.{.,i�
<br /> l'•�:4 nii;^•::{:;•n.::::.:::n.::: .::::ii:•;•;•i;ti4}•: .............:.v:::;.•:..::.:.::..`�::.:..:.iii. :;.f,:::::::.:::::::.v:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4:i;•iw:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::
<br /> .................................
<br /> Joyner Comment: This is a major change. Has it had any major discussion?
<br /> Comment: The application requirements shown above are essentially the same as currently required
<br /> for Concept Plans with several notable exceptions. First, the subdivider must submit an
<br /> Optional Plan for a Conventional Development (as currently required) as well as a Site
<br /> Analysis Map and an Optional Plan for a Flexible Development. This requirement
<br /> represents a "balance'between mandatory open space design and the o tional approach
<br /> currently allowed and is based on the Grafton, Massachusetts Flexible Development
<br /> ByLaws.
<br /> Second, the subdivider has the option of submitting a Flexible Development Plan only,
<br /> and combining the Site Analysis Map and the Flexible Development Option into a single
<br /> plan. tiv er '' cfi aa' ::>:rho:::o..:.rtn..::;: ......
<br /> n€lztretptea !lttx>;: : 'eat
<br /> Joyner Comment: This implies surveyor or other must do plan. Infoemal, to scale,
<br /> plans must be allowed as currently do.
<br /> The subdivider also has the option of submitting a Conventional Development Plan,
<br /> provided all lots are to be developed with units to be sold or rented to families earning
<br /> less than eighty percent (80%)of the Orange County median income. Such families have
<br /> incomes of$32,548, can afford a mortgage payment of approximately$680 per month,
<br /> or a mortgage of about$88,000(8.5% interest for 30 years).
<br /> Finally, the subdivider is required to provide stamped, addressed envelopes for use in
<br /> notifying adjacent property owners of the Public Information Meeting described below.
<br /> C.
<br /> tbf .:........ :: .:....`tcce :.::: : ix....:tiitte<:if: t?:lttut:€a.:.
<br /> ....... ........... ::::.::::::::::::. .:::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::........ ................. atitixx.: ...........
<br /> •:•::•::ip:4}'ri;{.:nom+ i' i:•iii'!ii?:n.::::;.::.:::::::..:i}>::;•.�.:�::.:_:::::.::::::.�:::.:�:::.::::�.�:
<br /> �:��I�:a:�?u���:€: �c�t���:.: Wit......,_;..... :....... ,..:.:�i.:....::. ., .:...:..:..:...::;::,....:::::i•;::::....:.:.::...:.::.;'::::
<br /> ... ...... ••• .Y. is .: .. :�•:•.:: .:..�::�:.�.:.�:.>':::v..,v..:::.::.:.::.�.: �y.:.r.:::..�.:.::..::.5..:�;:..:.::::.:: ::: "•:is.»'..: ::.: '.??iiiiii::�f?:::.::�,iry:{:Vii.::r::.�'{::ii...
<br /> ...i:.i:.:::v;;;•iin••ii:..ri';:::�i;':;•i••ii:.:{�:.::::.�ni:.iii;•i;•:;•:i:iii}ii}ii;•iiiii�'.i:'::.ii:�:.i:.i:.,:.�:.i:;::i::i isi' :.i:.: i::•i'viiii}:•i:•:•i:.:{•:{.i:.:.i:.ii:.iiii:�ii'�iiii:.i:::::.�::::.�:::::i:.ii...............
<br /> ! �#. :::�: ::: �:0�:: .>... c�:::��: ::.. ..��gtti?tti�•>�u€:::�ott .i... <: >: :: ...... .:: ::: :::at
<br /> kf �•::�: <iA.;.>;:':'».tom> '' ':'°::;>.:::;>::,i;i;i::;,::i:i>,,
<br /> Joyner Comment: This is probably premature at Concept Plan stage. Haven't perked or surveyed
<br /> yet. Major changes likely.
<br /> At the meeting, the Planning Department staff will explain the County's subdivision approval process, and
<br /> the applicant will be available to answer questions about the proposed subdivision.
<br /> Comment: This provision has been added to address the concerns of citizens who felt they should
<br /> have been notified of pending subdivision applications. The Public Information Meeting
<br /> process is similar to that used by the Town of Chapel Hill. The process benefits the
<br /> applicant by being able to present his/her design concept and hearing the concerns, if
<br /> any, of adjoining property owners. Adjoining owners have the opportunity of hearing
<br /> about the proposal at the beginning of the subdivision approval process from the
<br /> applicant.
<br /> d. Planning Department Review Procedures: Within forty-five (45) days of the date of the Public
<br /> Information Meeting or within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant, the Planning
<br /> Department shall submit to the Planning Board its recommendation, including a written analysis of the
<br /> Flexible Development 39
<br />
|