Orange County NC Website
Consensus" subcommittees that had been the study area, entranceway enhancement and <br /> previously formed. Over the next four months, beautification plan, affordable housing, and the <br /> the "Concerns by Consensus" subcommittees concept of a village with a mix of uses. The <br /> reported and made recommendations on the: Group proceeded to sketch park sites, <br /> commercial/mixed use sites,and a possible village <br /> ► conservation of natural and beautiful areas site in the study area. <br /> P. conservation of vistas <br /> ► diverse housing types, sizes, and costs In November, the Work Group discussed overall <br /> ► efficient provision of municipal services design concepts including mixed-use and <br /> ► adequate provision of transportation commercial development, access and circulation <br /> ► commercial development on community patterns, encouraging diversity of development <br /> scale. with amenities, and a sliding scale/performance <br /> zoning. <br /> Following all of these reports, the Work Group <br /> sought to determine areas of agreement and On December 6, 1994, Robin Lackey, Chair of <br /> disagreement by topic. In July of 1994, the Work the Small Area Planning Work Group (1993-95) <br /> Group began discussing possible locations for a presented an update on the Work Group's <br /> variety of uses including: commercial, residential, progress to the Board of Aldermen. She <br /> light industrial, mixed use, community services suggested that the Work Group's discussions were <br /> and recreational areas. As a follow-up, the Group pointing toward several conclusions: <br /> began mapping land uses based on its discussions. <br /> In September, the Work Group continued to • A rural village is needed somewhere in <br /> define and refine areas of agreement and the study area. <br /> disagreement, and discussed multi-modal • A large-scale retail, office and residential <br /> transportation network design issues. space, is needed around Homestead Road <br /> to serve the future residents that could <br /> As a follow-up to the joint meeting in January, double the population of Carrboro. <br /> Carrboro's Small Area Planning Work Group and • Additional land needs to be set aside for <br /> Chapel Hill's Northwest Small Area Plan Work new parks and schools to serve new <br /> Group continued to informally keep in touch residents. A greenway system is also <br /> through several liaisons who would occasionally needed. <br /> give brief monthly updates. On October 18, • Housing density should generally be <br /> 1994, the Carrboro Small Area Planning Work limited to about two homes per acre, <br /> Group and the Chapel Hill Northwest Small Area while simultaneously crafting development <br /> Plan Work Group held a second joint meeting. At ordinances and design standards to <br /> this meeting Chapel Hill's Work Group presented encourage affordable housing. <br /> a draft of its small area plan. The Carrboro Work <br /> Group provided an update on its status. On September 12, 1995, John Rintoul, Chair of <br /> the Small Area Plan Work Group presented a draft <br /> Later in October, the Carrboro Small Area Small Area Plan for Carrboro's Northern Transition <br /> Planning Work Group discussed the preservation Area to the the Board of Aldermen for review and <br /> and protection of Bolin Creek, density options in discussion. <br /> Page A-2 Northwest Small Area Plan <br />