Orange County NC Website
NPS F-xm 10.900-a OMB Approval No.1024-0018 <br /> (8-86) <br /> United States Department of the Interior 14 <br /> National Park Service <br /> National Register of Historic Places <br /> Continuation Sheet <br /> Section number 7 Page 2 <br /> Alexander Hogan Plantation <br /> Orange County,NC <br /> Description (continued) <br /> measure at least 50 ft long and 25 ft wide; a chimney fall is located on its east end. The remains of the west wall <br /> could not be located, although a stone rubble pile (A2) was located just west of the missing wall. Whether it was <br /> directly associated with the main foundation or not remains to be determined. At least three stone piers are situated <br /> parallel to the south wall,presumably representing the porch support. <br /> The remaining foundations are all located to the north of the presumed main house. Foundations B and C are <br /> located relatively close to the house, while foundations E1 and E2 are some 500 ft away adjacent to the cemetery. <br /> The function of the structures associated with these foundations is less certain. Given foundation B's proximity to the <br /> main house and the presence of a chimney fall, it may represent a detached kitchen. Foundation C, which does not <br /> exhibit any chimney remains, probably represents a plantation outbuilding. Likewise, foundations E1 and E2 also <br /> lack chimney remains. Two possible interpretations are proposed for these remains. Given their identical size and <br /> symmetrical placement (and their location away from the main house) they could represent the remains of slave <br /> dwellings. But, they exhibit no chimney remains which would be expected for structures that served as dwellings. <br /> Their absence, however, might be due to the fact that slave cabins in the state were often made from stick and mud <br /> (Crow et al. 1992:56-57) rather than stone. Chimneys made from such perishable materials, of course, would leave <br /> little archaeological evidence. On the other hand, it is also possible that no chimneys ever existed and these remains <br /> belong to a single large outbuilding such as a barn or to two other smaller plantation structures. <br /> Substantial artifact remains appear associated with most of these structures. Despite the presence of heavy <br /> vegetation, ceramic, glass, and metal artifacts can be seen on the surface in and around the foundations. To better <br /> assess the potential for buried deposits each of the foundation remains were subjected to some judgementally placed <br /> auger tests. Significant soil deposits were revealed within every foundation excluding E1 and E2. For example, <br /> about 12 inches of fill was encountered within foundation Al, including 8 inches of ash and 4 inches of humus and <br /> burned clay. Furthermore, a similar soil and ash deposit was also present within foundation B. Because these <br /> foundations likely mark the areas of the most intensive site activity as well as the most concentrated deposits from <br /> these activities, the recovery of artifacts and features that would help interpret these former structures seems great. <br /> Further discussion of the significance of these remains is presented below. <br /> The only other known significant site feature is the cemetery that contains two distinct groups of graves. The <br /> first group is contained by a low stone wall, 45 by 35 ft in size that contains four identifiable graves marked by <br /> fieldstones. Judging from the layout of the headstones and footstones, three adult and one child grave are present. <br /> No other graves are readily discernible within the enclosure. The second group is located in two rows just outside the <br /> north wall of the enclosure and contains about 20 graves. These graves too are characterized by unmarked <br /> fieldstones. All graves have a characteristic east-west orientation and are covered by a blanket of periwinkle. <br />