Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-F - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

NPS fu m 10.900-a OMa MWaraj No.1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior 13 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 7 Page —1— Alexander Hogan Plantation Orange County,NC Description(continued) Alexander marred Matilda Robson in 1854. The couple had 8 children, probably two of which died at a young age. Alexander apparently also fathered at least one child by one of his slaves. As was typical for the county, only a small number of slaves were ever present on the plantation. In 1840, 3 slaves were recorded for the property. By 1850 Hogan had 8 slaves working on his plantation, most of which were under the age of 12. By the end of the decade the slave presence grew to 13,most of whom were under 20 years old. After the Civil War significant changes took place on the plantation as portions of it were rented to sharecroppers. Alexander died in 1872 leaving Matilda in charge of the farm until her death sometime after 1890. Some of the surviving children inherited the farm and subsequently sold or deeded portions of the property to former Hogan slaves. At least one such descendent, Essie (Hogan) Leak, lives near the site today and has provided some oral accounts of her childhood recollections of the plantation site. Little is known about the disposition of the site during the early twentieth century. Duke Forest acquired the former Hogan tract in several parcels from 1944 to 1945. Although there is some mention in Duke files of an abandoned house site on the property, no standing structural remains were apparently present. Today the site is primarily marked by the foundation remains of at least four and possibly five structures and a cemetery marked by a low stone wall enclosure with unmarked fieldstones denoting burial locations both inside and outside the stone enclosure (Daniel 1994). Together these remains cover approximately 12 acres. The site has received some preliminary archaeological work in the form of a general survey, mapping, and augering. It should be emphasized, however,that other less obvious remains might still be unrecorded. A more intensive and systematic survey is needed to make this determination. As described below, site integrity is unusually good. Because Duke Forest guidelines mandate that archaeological and historic sites on University property be left undisturbed, the site has been well-preserved. Excluding the presence of a powerline right-of-way that runs through the southern end of the site, it has suffered no significant disturbances. In fact, with the exception of forest regeneration, the site probably appears much as it did when acquired some 50 years ago. The most apparent features of the site are the stone foundations. One of these foundations (Al)tentatively has been identified as the location of the main house. Oral accounts have described it as a large two-story white plank house with approximately 10 to 12 steps leading to a front porch. Foundation Al certainly appears to have been a dwelling and it exhibits the largest dimensions of any of the known foundations on the site. The foundations