Orange County NC Website
September 18 , 1995 Planning Board Minutes (draft) <br /> 20 <br /> AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING (8/28/95) <br /> a. Amendments - Economic Development Districts <br /> ( 1) CP-1-95 I-40/Old NC 86 EDD <br /> (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) <br /> (2) Z-6-95 I-40/Old NC 86 EDD <br /> (Zoning Atlas Amendment) <br /> Presentation of these items by Mary Willis. <br /> These items are to consider expansion of the <br /> I-40/Old NC 86 Economic Development District to <br /> include the remaining portion of two parcels <br /> currently split by the district. <br /> On January 17, 1995, the Board of Commissioners <br /> approved a 720-acre EDD in the vicinity of the <br /> I-40/Old NC 86 interchange, and on June 26, 1995, <br /> revised the EDD boundary to include a strip of <br /> properties along the west side of Old NC 86 north <br /> of Cates Creek. <br /> At issue are two properties split by the EDD <br /> boundary between Primary and Secondary <br /> Development Areas. <br /> Allen and Sally Ann Addison own a 114-acre parcel <br /> in the northwest quadrant of the EDD. <br /> Approximately 80 acres of the Addison property on <br /> the east side of Cates Creek was included in the <br /> EDD as Primary Development Area. The property <br /> owner has requested that the portion of the lot <br /> located on the west side of Cates Creek also be <br /> included in the EDD. <br /> The area in question contains about 34 acres. It <br /> is bounded by I-40 to the south and west, and <br /> Cates Creek and the boundary of the existing EDD <br /> to the east. The property to the north is zoned <br /> R-3 and is currently undeveloped. It may be <br /> developed later as a part of Cornwallis Hills. <br /> Although steep slopes will create more <br /> development constraints on the west side of Cates <br /> Creek than the flatter area found on the east <br /> side, non-residential development could occur to <br /> the extent that the provisions of the EDD Design <br /> Manual allow. Residential development is less <br /> desirable and feasible due to the location of the <br /> area adjacent to both I-40 and the existing EDD. <br /> Access could be provided either by a frontage <br />