Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 10-02-95
>
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2015 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
1/7/2015 2:48:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-D
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951002
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SER-12-1995 10:33 FROM ORANGE CTY COMMISSIONERS TO EROSIN/PLAN P.03/09 <br /> Z 9 <br /> J <br /> and be designated as Primary Development Area. The other parcel in <br /> question is the Moren property. This consists of an 87-acre tract <br /> located in the northernmost portion of the northeast quadrant of the <br /> EDD. Most of the Moren property was included in the EDD except a small <br /> area containing about four acres adjacent to Stagecoach Run <br /> Subdivision. of the area in the EDD, about one-half is designated as <br /> Primary Development Area, and the other half as Secondary Development <br /> Area. The property owner has requested that the remaining acreage be <br /> included in the EDD and that the entire parcel be designated as Primary <br /> I . The Planning Staff recommends that the remaining Moren property be <br /> included in the EDD as Secondary Development Area. It is also <br /> recommended that the existing Secondary Development Area remain as a <br /> buffer between the Primary Area and existing or potential residential <br /> development to the east. <br /> With reference to the Addison property, Commissioner Gordon asked <br /> why some of the property is not secondary, especially next to <br /> Cornwallis Hills . Mary Willis said that the property itself because of <br /> the natural constraints will limit the use of the property to some <br /> extent. In terms of the uses allowed in both the primary and <br /> secondary, the secondary area is much more limited and by designating <br /> it as primary, it does allow more flexibility in terms of uses and <br /> trying to tie into whatever types of activity occurring on the <br /> remainder of the property. <br /> Commissioner Crowther asked if the undeveloped portion of <br /> Cornwallis Hills was annexed with the developed portion. It was <br /> clarified by a citizen living in Cornwallis Hills that no annexation <br /> has occurred .yet. <br /> In answer to a question from Chair Carey, Willis said that on the <br /> Moren property there is not a road that is built in that area but that <br /> there is an easement for access purposes. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit asked for the rationale in adding the <br /> Addison parcel and not the other area adjacent to it on the north. <br /> Willis said that area is zoned R-3 and may be an expansion of <br /> Cornwallis Hills but they have not received a request. The reason for <br /> not zoning the Addison property R-3 and making it a part of the EDD is <br /> primary its proximity to I-40 and that because of the topography, the <br /> uses will be limited. The frontage along the northern boundary could <br /> provide a more central stream crossing to provide access to this area. <br /> The reason for receiving public comments at this time is that this <br /> parcel was not included in the previous public hearing advertisement. <br /> Willis said that in tests of the expansion of the EDD, the staff can <br /> come forward with requests for expansion. With- the addition of these <br /> two parcels, they view this as an effort to fine-tune the specific <br /> locations .of the boundaries. With reference to the area with the <br /> slops, there will be design constraints in terms of providing areas for <br /> the building. and parking. <br /> Willis indicated that these are the only two identified parcel <br /> that want to be added. In terms of the access road into the EDD, it is <br /> their intent for these roads not to go through a residential area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.