Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 10-02-95
>
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2015 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
1/7/2015 2:48:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-D
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951002
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stf'-12-1955 10:37 rRON ORt4NGE CTY k.-`Mtl i z-)S i ONERS TO EROS I N/PLAN P.05/09 <br /> V I � � 4 6 <br /> Dili <br /> Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners <br /> no sooner than October 2, 1995. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> O. Article 6.29.3 - Economic Development Districts Design <br /> Manual (Zoning ordinance Text Amendment) <br /> Planner Mary Willis presented to receive public comments <br /> a proposed amendment to eliminate the requirement for a 100-foot buffer <br /> along the perimeter of an Economic Development District (EDD) which <br /> abuts an EDD adopted by another planning jurisdiction. The area added <br /> to the EDD on June 26 including properties along the <br /> NC86 north of Cates Creek ranges from 300 to 500 feet in depth, and the <br /> perimeter buffer of 100 feet poses development constraints . The staff <br /> proposes that the Design Manual be modified to state that where the <br /> perimeter of the EDD abuts, not just another jurisdictional boundary, <br /> but one where the EDD provisions have been adopted, that in those cases <br /> the perimeter boundary not apply since there is the same zoning on <br /> either side of the property. <br /> In answer to a question from Commissioner Willhoit, Willis said <br /> that the goal of the buffer is to protect adjacent properties from any <br /> affects of the EDD. He is concerned that this will look like a <br /> commercial strip and wonders if there should be some kind of buffers. <br /> Willis explained that there are still setback and landscaping/screening <br /> requirements that are a part of the Design Standards that prevent that <br /> strip from occurring. <br /> In answer to a question from Bill Waddell, Willis said that the <br /> natural constraints, floodplains, etc. of the creek itself would remain <br /> to whatever width is applicable. <br /> Mary Willis clarified that the 100-foot wide buffer need not be <br /> provided when the land located in the jurisdiction of the other local <br /> government has been zoned Economic Development District and designated <br /> the same (e.g. Primary Development, Secondary Development) as the land <br /> located in the Orange County Economic Development District . <br /> answer to a question from Planning Board member Renee Price, Willis <br /> said that there will be open space. Planning Director Marvin Collins <br /> said that when the Economic Development Design Manual was adopted, <br /> there are schematic plans that designate certain areas as open space <br /> and in addition to that there is a large amount of green space. Based <br /> on calculations, within that whole area, there will be at least 40% <br /> open space. <br /> Mary Willis clarified for Karen Barrows the area this proposed <br /> amendment would apply. <br /> Renee Price noted her concern is the gateway into Hillsborough and <br /> she wonders what this area will look like for those living in <br /> Cornwallis Hills . She is concerned about the elimination of the buffer <br /> even with the Design Standards in place. Mary Willis said that when <br /> the district was first adopted there was no buffer that was <br /> specifically required along NC86 for addressing the concerns that were <br /> known. When this portion was added, the only reason that the buffer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.