Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 10-02-95
>
Agenda - 10-02-1995 - IX-D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2015 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
1/7/2015 2:48:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-D
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951002
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br /> 10 <br /> neighboring jurisdictions have adopted these <br /> standards. It does not affect any other area and <br /> it is highly unlikely that it will ever affect <br /> the Highway 70/I-85 EDD. <br /> Barrows expressed concern about administration <br /> and the elimination of buffers and that the <br /> neighboring jurisdictions would not maintain the <br /> same standards. <br /> Brown referred to the annexation of Cornwallis <br /> Hills asking why the two properties, Addison <br /> and Moren were not annexed. Howie responded that <br /> she had asked Hillsborough that question. The <br /> answer was that those properties do not have <br /> utilities and the Town of Hillsborough is <br /> unwilling to expend the funds to provide <br /> utilities. Brown continued that she was opposed <br /> to the rezoning of these properties to EDD and <br /> she felt that Cornwallis Hills had not been <br /> considered. She was not in favor of anything that <br /> would not further buffer Cornwallis Hills. She <br /> felt that the County could generate a plan to <br /> maintain the area as residential and prevent a <br /> "commercial strip nightmare" . <br /> Walters reminded the Board that all of the area <br /> cannot be mandated as green space or be declared <br /> unbuildable without compensation. The law <br /> carries that provision. The Board must be very <br /> careful in such instances. <br /> Jobsis stated that her understanding of the <br /> design standards indicate that the development <br /> will be quality development, not haphazard and it <br /> does not make sense to have a 100-foot buffer <br /> between two primary development areas. <br /> Price indicated she had not received a complete <br /> answer to a previous question. She asked if any <br /> schematics, isometric or straight on, had been <br /> done of what NC 86 would look like from the <br /> street to Cornwallis Hills when it is developed. <br /> Willis responded that there is a cross section in <br /> the design manual to address that. Price asked if <br /> it indicated what would show in the backyard. <br /> Willis responded that it shows a cross section of <br /> the road itself, it does not go into specific <br /> properties. Price continued asking if any <br /> drawings are to be done to indicate how much of <br /> the residential area will be seen from the street <br /> once the road is widened, median put in and <br /> buildings completed. Willis responded that such <br /> drawings have not been done. She continued that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.