Orange County NC Website
e <br /> � 1 <br /> O R A N G E C 0 U N T Y <br /> BOARD OF -COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date October 2 , 1995 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item # 1=4 <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS <br /> TEXT AMENDMENTS <br /> Article 12 Landscaping and Buffer Requirements <br /> Section IV-B-8 Landscape and Buffer Requirements <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & INSPECTIONS PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron <br /> Extension 2580 <br /> Proposed Amendments <br /> 8/28/95 Public Hearing <br /> Minutes TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br /> 9/18/95 Draft Planning Hillsborough - 732-8181 <br /> Board Minutes Durham - 688-7331 <br /> Mebane - 227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill - 967-9251/968-4501 <br /> PURPOSE: Consideration of proposed amendments to the Zoning <br /> Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations regarding the <br /> amount of a financial guarantee for required <br /> landscaping. <br /> BACKGROUND: In most developments where landscaping is required in <br /> addition to preserving existing trees, the owner/ <br /> applicant usually proposes to install the landscaping <br /> without hiring a contractor to do the work. The <br /> difference in cost between an owner-installed job and <br /> the services of a contractor is 250 to 300 percent. <br /> In the event the County had to obtain funds guaranteed <br /> by a bond, letter of credit, or escrow agreement, the <br /> landscape improvements could only be completed if the <br /> amount guaranteed included labor costs as well as the <br /> cost of plant materials. The proposed amendment to the <br /> landscape regulations makes explicit the intent of the <br /> financial guarantee to cover the cost to purchase and <br /> install required landscaping, that is, to include <br /> labor costs. The amendment also specifies that the <br /> person who prepares the cost estimate shall have no <br /> direct or indirect ownership interest in the project. <br /> The proposed ordinance revisions were presented at the <br /> August 28 public hearing. No questions or comments <br />