Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-06-2008-6bx
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 03-06-2008
>
Agenda - 03-06-2008-6bx
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:54:31 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:49:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6bx
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080306
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
spots; typically, especially with cable, that 15% is paid for by what he can save the client by <br />arranging the media buy <br />^ Would there be value in getting out next week to talk to a couple of groups, including. realtors, to <br />fmd out what their questions are? <br />^ Chatham County's flier seems way too dense, has way too many words on it, but they do have <br />some pretty good questions <br />^ This group has already hit on the major points: what the needs are, what are the possible <br />ramifications -don't do certain things? not keep up school construction? higher property taxes? <br />all of those are pretty well understood ramifications that are factual, because that's what might <br />happen; you're really choosing to be taxed one way or another <br />^ One of the deficiencies in the Chatham County flier was that they didn't get into the alternatives <br />^ County Commissioners can decide they'll pledge to spend the proceeds on certain things and <br />that's fine to put in a document <br />^ Commissioners have made commitments in the past for how (bond) money would be allocated <br />and they stuck to that, keeping their promises <br />^ This isn't an extra revenue so they could do something new, like aone-time expense -it's added <br />revenue to meet the obligations <br />^ BOCC being as specific as they can and as firm in their commitment as they can would give <br />people something factual to evaluate, rather than just saying we're. going to pass this tax, let the <br />money go into the General Fund, and we'll let you know what we're going to do with it later <br />^ County is going to have schools, sheriffs, whatever it needs -it's going to build that new school; <br />it doesn't matter whether moneys are committed; all the money looks the same when it's sitting <br />in the bank <br />^ Some folks will say that since schools are such an emotional issue, "that's why they're saying <br />the money will go to the schools"; schools and parks are very emotional issues; nobody wants to <br />be seen as not supporting education <br />^ The General Fund is easier to be against -you can say "just cut the budget" <br />^ If funds are pledged to the capital budget, then the quality of the schools and the rate at which <br />they go on could be affected by this, and the number of pupils per classroom for some given <br />period of time could be affected <br />^ The number of trailers could be affected; residential CAPS, and the Adequate Public Facilities <br />Ordinance could be tested <br />^ One way to posture this is that there are needs by the County, and they're going to be met, and <br />you get to pick - do you want to pay the taxes with a transfer tax or do you want to pay it with <br />your property tax? that's the choice you get on this ballot <br />^ Another way is to say look "the immediate needs of the County is they've got to build <br />Elementary#11, and this County building, acquire this land, or complete these parks" <br />^ Those are the two primary discussion points -why do you need this money, and why is the land <br />transfer tax a good alternative <br />^ This could be a supplement to school bonds because the County is at its debt capacity <br />^ Whatever informational points are to be communicated to voters have to be few -maybe one or <br />two -and they have to be very simple, straightforward, and repetitive <br />^ Chatham County's document could serve as a template if you change the content and simplify it <br />^ The Web should be the channel to deliver more information; all our pamphlets should simply <br />state a couple of high level facts in big print, with a good picture and pointers to the Website <br />^ Most of voting population understand what's in their pocketbook and if they hear transfer tax <br />they'll go "they're going to take that money out of my pocket - we need to defeat that"; they <br />need to understand that if they don't sell their house, they won't pay anything out; if they sell <br />their farmland, they'll pay .4% of that, and if they don't own a house, they won't be paying it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.