Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
87 <br /> type work than repair. Mr. Garrett's affidavit <br /> seemed to indicate that individuals went to the <br /> area to do work on their own cars rather than <br /> taking them to someone else for repair. That was <br /> what helped to determine that it was more "hobby <br /> type work" than a auto repair business. If that <br /> was not the case, then the affidavit needs to be <br /> more clearly stated. <br /> Grainger Barrett, attorney for the three <br /> neighbors who brought the case, stated that he <br /> was aware of the sympathy for someone operating a <br /> business. However, he knew that he was taking a <br /> calculated risk. Not only is there a different <br /> use than was there in 1981, also, there have been <br /> two different owners. Mr. Combs brought the <br /> original rezoning application because the Staff <br /> considered him to be in violation of the existing <br /> zoning. <br /> Mr. Barrett continued, stating that Mr. Combs <br /> clearly did things that were intended to minimize <br /> the amount of regulatory scrutiny that came upon <br /> him. He continued referring to the permit <br /> application for a $2,000 structure for a 1440 <br /> square foot addition that was to be used to allow <br /> individuals to restore their own personal cars. <br /> When the Zoning Enforcement Officer inspected the <br /> site, it was basically a major league automotive <br /> operation. There were two or three bays, heavy <br /> jacks, lifts and other heavy duty equipment. <br /> Mr. Barrett stated that the Judge had determined <br /> that removing parts from junked cars and <br /> repairing cars on the site was part of what a <br /> junkyard is. Mr. Barrett also referred to a <br /> statement by County Attorney, Geof Gledhill from <br /> the public hearing minutes: "Mr. Reid's testimony <br /> last time was not sufficient and there was not <br /> any other evidence to prove what was there. A <br /> salvage shop is not a body shop. " He continued <br /> that the Judge realized that there were some <br /> parts being taken off cars, but it did not <br /> convince him that it was anything other than a <br /> junkyard. Mr. Barrett also noted that the <br /> original application by Mr. Combs himself called <br /> the business a junkyard. He also noted that the <br /> attorney for Mr. Combs and Mr. Wilson called the <br /> business a junkyard all through the testimony. <br /> It was constantly called "junked cars" . No one <br /> said that there was any major activity on the <br /> site other than junked cars and storage of <br /> vehicles. Everyone also said that Mr. Martin, <br /> owner in 1981, had a shop elsewhere and stored <br />