Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-1995 - IX-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 09-05-95
>
Agenda - 09-05-1995 - IX-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2014 4:36:14 PM
Creation date
12/18/2014 4:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950905
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
44 <br /> removed. Eidenier continued asking if Mr. Combs <br /> had been a belligerent citizen and difficult to - <br /> deal with. Hinkley responded no, that Mr. Combs ti <br /> had been a gentleman and easy to deal with. <br /> Eidenier asked then if Hinkley felt frequent <br /> monitoring would require that a Deputy accompany <br /> him to the site. Hinkley responded that would <br /> not be necessary in monitoring the Combs case. <br /> Mr. Zadjeika stated that a question of compliance <br /> had been raised and that there is an issue of <br /> compliance that is not being met at the present <br /> time. Cantrell responded that is not what is <br /> before the Board. What is before the Board is an <br /> EC-5 zoning and that is all the Board can <br /> address. The only information that can be <br /> considered now is information that was not <br /> available at the original public hearing. <br /> Ms. Noonan referred to the cars that Hinkley had <br /> indicated had been removed from the back lot. <br /> She noted that automobiles were still there. <br /> Cantrell responded that that was an issue of <br /> compliance and is not what the Board is dealing <br /> with at this time. Eidenier noted that the Board <br /> of Commissioners had suggested that the Planning :a <br /> Board look at compliance. Ms. Noonan presented <br /> photographs of automobiles on the site noting <br /> that they were not located in the area being <br /> requested for the EC-5 zoning. Hinkley stated <br /> that he had given Mr. Combs permission to move <br /> the cars onto the back lot until the crusher <br /> could be placed there to crush and remove the <br /> cars. Mr. Combs stated that he is awaiting the <br /> decision of the Planning Board. The car crusher <br /> is available to remove all or part of the cars <br /> once Mr. Combs receives a decision from the Board <br /> of County Commissioners on the rezoning. <br /> Ms. Noonan continued expressing concern that <br /> the number of cars on the site seemed to be <br /> increasing. Mr. Combs stated that, if the <br /> decision is made by the Board of Commissioners <br /> that the cars are to be removed, he has arranged <br /> with a car crusher to crush and remove them. <br /> Mr. Lloyd stated that the photographs being <br /> viewed by the Board were taken. by him this <br /> morning. <br /> Mr. Combs responded that Mr. Lloyd had to climb <br /> a twelve foot pile of dirt with trees growing on <br /> the top and go onto the Combs property in order <br /> to take the photographs. Mr. Combs indicated Mr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.