Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-03-1995 - VIII-K
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 08-03-95
>
Agenda - 08-03-1995 - VIII-K
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2014 11:11:29 AM
Creation date
12/11/2014 11:11:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-K
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950803
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> � 1 <br /> OR AN G E C O UK T Y <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: August 3, 1995 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item # V=-K <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT <br /> Article 8 - Special Uses <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> Mary Willis <br /> Proposed amendment Extension 2583 <br /> Correspondence from County Attorney <br /> Draft 5/31/95 Public Hearing Minutes TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br /> Draft 6/19/95 Planning Board Minutes Hillsborough-732-8181 <br /> Durham -688-7331 <br /> Mebane -227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill -967-9251 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance <br /> which would clarify who bears the burden of proof in the <br /> consideration of Special Use Permits. <br /> BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment was initiated and drafted by the <br /> County Attorney after reviewing several recent appeals of <br /> Board of Adjustment decisions. <br /> The proposed amendment clarifies that the applicant bears <br /> the burden of proof to show that a proposed Special Use is <br /> in harmony with the surrounding area, and that those <br /> opposing approval of a Special Use have the burden of <br /> proof in establishing that the use does not satisfy <br /> approval requirements. <br /> The proposed amendment was presented for public hearing on <br /> May 31, 1995. There were no comments. <br /> The Planning Board considered the proposed amendment on <br /> June 19, 1995, and recommended approval. The vote was <br /> unanimous. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the proposed <br /> amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.