Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-1995 - IX-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 06-26-95
>
Agenda - 06-26-1995 - IX-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 9:23:06 AM
Creation date
12/9/2014 9:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950626
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
57 <br /> property. <br /> Waddell stated that he would like to have the two <br /> groups of residents meet and come back to the <br /> Planning Board with a recommendation that is <br /> agreeable to both. He asked for a show of hands <br /> from the audience for agreement, and there seemed to <br /> be a majority interested in such a meeting. <br /> Ms. Haas stated that she did not feel the issue is <br /> reconcilable in that discussion has been going on at <br /> least three years. Waddell responded that he really <br /> felt that the two groups could come to a reasonable <br /> compromise that would be an acceptable solution for <br /> both groups. He felt the two groups were not as far <br /> apart as Ms. Haas felt they were. <br /> MOTION: Burklin moved to address the area south of Cates <br /> Creek tonight and the area north of Cates Creek at <br /> the regular January 23, 1995 meeting. Seconded by <br /> Hoecke. <br /> MOTION: 8 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Brown - felt there was sufficient <br /> information to continue and make a recommendation) . <br /> Burklin asked the status of the discussion on <br /> utility service areas. Collins responded that the <br /> Task Force working on that issue has delineated <br /> three service areas and he located the boundaries on <br /> the map. <br /> Adjournment time was reached. <br /> MOTION: Hoecke moved to extend the meeting ten minutes to <br /> complete the discussion. Seconded by Burklin. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Brown) . <br /> Burklin stated that he would like for Orange County <br /> and Hillsborough to complete the agreements on <br /> utility service areas and the Rural Character <br /> agreements before moving very aggressively on water <br /> and sewer extension. <br /> Jobsis asked if it is viable to designate the area <br /> EDD if the extension of water and sewer is not <br /> available. Collins responded that he felt it is <br /> developable, but it will be a lower density <br /> development with wells and septic tanks. An <br /> alternative system could be a possibility. If there <br /> is a choice of public water and sewer or alternative <br /> system, the choice would be public water and sewer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.