Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-2008-6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 02-19-2008
>
Agenda - 02-19-2008-6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 8:50:16 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:44:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080219
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-018a Conduct of a Advisory Referendum -Question of Whether to Levy a Local Land Transfer Tax
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL REVENUE OPTIONS <br />EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />Pros/Cons/Observations on Local Revenue Options <br />February 14, 2008 <br />Either option, if implemented, would relieve the pressure on Orange County ad valorem <br />property taxes. Without either of these alternate forms of taxation, the likely alternative is <br />higher ad valorem property taxes for everyone given the county's expected revenue needs <br />and the loss of revenue the county will experience as a result of the state's assumption of <br />the article 44 sales tax (as part of its assumption of Medicaid responsibilities). <br />Citizens need to realize that any possible tax option on the ballot is choosing how they <br />wish to be taxed, not how much they wish to be taxed. <br />Pros FOR Transfer Tax <br />• Predicted to produce more revenue over the long run than the sales tax option <br />(though Donna is going to re-run the numbers at our request) <br />• Diversifies Orange County's possible revenue streams (as opposed to increasing <br />one of the existing two); creating more stable base for investment in essential <br />infrastructure <br />• Transfer taxes allow fixed income residents to defer their taxation <br />• The majority of the group believes that because the transfer tax will be a known cost <br />at closing, in reality it will be factored into the sale price. Technically the tax is paid <br />by the seller, however the party that bears the cost in the economic sense may <br />vary. <br />• Unlike ad valorem property taxes (the likely alternative if Orange County needs <br />more revenue), it is only paid at the time of sale, not every year <br />• It is capped by statute at %0.4 of the sale value of the home. <br />• The transfer tax is levied based on the sale price and not the assessed value (as <br />compared to ad valorem property tax) <br />• The majority of the group believes that the transfer tax is more progressive than <br />sales tax. <br />• The transfer tax revenue will track the real estate market. <br />• One Time Tax assessed when property is sold. <br />• Gifts of real estate & inherited transfers are exempt by statute <br />Cons AGAINST Transfer Tax <br />• In the course of new development, a transfer tax may be paid multiple times before <br />a new house gets sold. For example, in 2007, this would have applied to 14% of <br />the sales in Orange County, that were new construction (Source: 2007 TMLS). This <br />may make new construction more expensive. For example, a farmer may sell land
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.