Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> 3 <br /> TRIANGLE AREA WATER SUPPLY MONITORING PROJECT <br /> 100 PARK DRIVE POST OFFICE BOX 12276 Received <br /> RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709 April 6, 1995 <br /> (919) 549-0551 <br /> Mr. John Link, Manager JUN 5 ., 1995 <br /> Orange County <br /> P.O. Box 8181 Managers Office <br /> Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 <br /> Apex <br /> Carrboro Dear Mr. Link: <br /> Cary It is time to consider phase III of the Triangle Area Water Supply Monitoring Project. Tile <br /> Project Steering Committee recommends that your Board adopt the attached Amendment <br /> Chapel Hill to the Interlocal Agreement, which would modify and extend the Monitoring Project for <br /> Chatham County four years. In order to meet administrative deadlines, it asks that you return a duly signed <br /> copy of the Amendment by May 31 st. <br /> Durham <br /> As you know, the Monitoring Project, which began in 1988, has been a unique partnership. <br /> Hillsborough The Steering Committee, with voting representatives from the participating local govern- <br /> Orange County ments, has a cooperative agreement with USGS to conduct the water monitoring and to <br /> share the monitoring costs (USGS provides a 100% cost match). In addition, NCDEM <br /> OWASA supplies data to USGS from its ambient monitoring sites for inclusion in the project data- <br /> base. The Project estimates that NCDEM's contribution has a replacement cost of <br /> Pittsboro $100,000. Finally, the Steering Committee contracts with Triangle J as the project man- <br /> Raleigh ager. This partnership results in the local participants contributing$231.733 to a monitor- <br /> ing program valued at$543.000. <br /> Sanford <br /> As the Steering Committee designed Phase III, one of its primary goals was to avoid cost <br /> Smithfield increases to local governments. We are pleased to report that we have met that goal. The <br /> City of Raleigh is now exploring other project alternatives to lower the monitoring cost. <br /> Therefore, the attached interlocal agreement includes two workplans. Workplan#1 - our <br /> strongest recommendation - includes the City of Raleigh. Workplan#2 is our recommen- <br /> dation in the event the City of Raleigh does not participate. Adopting the interlocal agree- <br /> ment essentially allows the Steering Committee to implement#1 or#2. Your cost is the <br /> same for either option. I would like to note that, in the coming weeks, Raleigh may send <br /> you an alternative monitoring project proposal about which the Steering Committee has <br /> serious technical concerns. If you have any questions about the attached interlocal agree- <br /> ment or any alternative proposal, please call me (968-4421) or your Steering Committee <br /> representative. <br /> Yours truly, <br /> Kathryn Kalb, Project Chair <br /> cc: David Stancil, Steering Committee Representative <br /> A WORLD CLASS REGION <br /> PUTTING VISION INTO ACTION <br />