Orange County NC Website
6 <br />1 <br />surrendered their home to a lender through foreclosure. Historically, CHT has re-acquired <br />2 <br />property at risk of foreclosure and plans to continue this trend. <br />3 <br />4 <br />To address the issue of difficulty inselling homes, CHT has proposed that it be allowed to sell <br />5 <br />homes that contain federal subsidy through the HOME program to households with an income <br />6 <br />of up to 115% of the Area Median income (AMI), where permissible by US Department of <br />7 <br />Housing & Urban Development (HUD) guidelines. The HOME Program imposes an affordability <br />8 <br />period on projects assisted with HOME funds in order to ensure that HOME investments yield <br />9 <br />affordable housing over the long term. For homebuyer projects such as the Community Home <br />10 <br />Trust, thelength of the affordability period is based on the amount of HOME funds invested in <br />11 <br />the property: <br />12 <br />HOME FUNDS PROVIDED AFFORDABILITY PERIOD <br />13 <br /><$15,0005 years <br />14 <br />$15,000 -$40,00010 years <br />15 <br />> $40,00015 years <br />16 <br />17 <br />However, the restrictive covenants CHT executes with the County stipulate 99 years of <br />18 <br />affordability. As a result, houses that are originally sold with the assistance of HOME funds that <br />19 <br />are later re-acquired by CHT must be re-sold to a family earning less than 80% AMI. Otherwise, <br />20 <br />CHT must refund the HOME funds invested to the County from the proceeds of the sale. <br />21 <br />22 <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br />There is no financial impact regarding the policy allowing CHT to extend <br />23 <br />a fee simple interest in properties sold. However, should the Board approve the proposed policy <br />24 <br />change regarding selling homes to families above 80% AMI where the federal subsidy remains <br />25 <br />in the home, this may reduce the number of low and moderately-low income families served by <br />26 <br />the Orange County HOME Consortium. Notwithstanding this reduction in low income families <br />27 <br />served, the affordability period as mandated by HUD would be met. <br />28 <br />29 <br />Bonnie Hammersley said there was also request by CHT for the Board to consider a <br />30 <br />charter. She said she is meeting with the local managers to bring a unified recommendation to <br />31 <br />the Assembly of Governments in November. <br />32 <br />Commissioner Gordon asked what would be involved in the charter. <br />33 <br />Bonnie Hammersley said staff islooking at the current Community Home Trust model, <br />34 <br />andthey will be inviting Robert Dowling to meet with them to talk about the current model. <br />35 <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked aboutthe mechanics of the changethat is being <br />36 <br />requested. He asked whetherapproved change will only be effective going forward, or whether <br />37 <br />it will affect homes currently being sold. <br />38 <br />Robert Dowling saidthe HUD guidelines have a much shorter affordabilityperiod than <br />39 <br />the 99 year restrictions CHT imposed on itself. He said the home funds and local funds have a <br />40 <br />much shorter affordability period, and the longest the home funds have is 20 years. He said <br />41 <br />CHT has homes that they put HOMEfunds into 12 years ago, and the HUD funds have been <br />42 <br />met. He said this home nowcannot be sold to anyone above80 percentmedian income, <br />43 <br />because of the self imposed 99 year restriction. He said if this proposed change is approved, <br />44 <br />CHT can widen the window of buyers served. He said no more subsidiescan be put in the <br />45 <br />home, but the funds put in 12 years ago can be left in, and this will allow them to serve people <br />46 <br />at up to115percent of median income. <br />47 <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if the 115 percent would kick in after the 20 year required <br />48 <br />HUD period elapsed. <br />49 <br />Robert Dowling said that is correct. <br /> <br />