Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-2014 - 7c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 12-01-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-01-2014 - 7c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:38:34 PM
Creation date
11/26/2014 8:44:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7c
Document Relationships
2015-113 Planning - Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between OC-City of Durham, Construction-Operation of Water-Sewer Facilities in the Eno ED Zone
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2015
Minutes 12-01-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 8 a Conclusions and Recommendations <br />that improvements implemented in the City's system lythe time build-out werotnocco may address <br />the minor deficiencies. Therefore, no additional water distribution infrastructure isrecommended. <br />The only municipal wastewater infrastructure within the EnmBDD isu small pump station near the <br />eastern most boundary ny the project area that conveys u small amount of flow te the City. Therefore, <br />a wastewater collection and conveyance system backbone is required within the EuoBDD. <br />Recommended collection system infrastructure and associated conceptual opinions of probable cost <br />were developed for the Low and High wastewater flow scenarios. Tables 8-2 and 8-3 present the <br />recommended infrastructure and associated.cost for the Low and High flow scenarios, respectively. <br />lo order to construct the recommended infrastructure, a number of regulatory permits will be <br />required. Iuuo effort tominimize environmental impacts and associated permitting efforts, trmudl*ou <br />construction methodologies were assumed for stream and roadway crossiugm.7bepokan1bUoeedfor <br />an EA/EIS could be required as a result of the amount of infrastructure included in the project, but is <br />not a certainty. If the gravity sewer and forco main proposed to parallel US Hwy 70 cannot be installed <br />within the NCDOT road ROW, the need for an alternative alignment qnd/or easement acquisition <br />could be required, which would lengthen the project schedule and inipact project cost. This would <br />need tobe addressed early iu the design Dbu�eto minimize impacts. <br />It is recognized that the costs presented io either Table U-2or Table B-3 would bea significant <br />investment for the County and that immediately funding the project jo its entirety will hoa challenge. <br />Therefore, the following options to potentially reduce project cost aild/or phase the improvements <br />were identified and are presented below. <br />� <br />Construct only the pump station and force main. Collection system infrastructure could be <br />constructed by developers on an as-needed basis, orbv the County if additional funding <br />becomes available. <br />Construct the pump station, force main, and only the most cridc;JI collection system <br />infrastructure. The collection system piping neoouzoueodedfomtbisupdoniodndoagravdtyyipoy <br />2, 4, and 6, as identified on Figure 6-1. Constructing these gravity pipes would prevent <br />developers from having to impact Rhodes Creek and DS Hwy 7U, both nf which will have. <br />permitting challenges. _ <br />Construct the force main from the proposed pump station tnamanhole in the Citys wastewater <br />collection system near the Eno 2DDboundary, as opposed to all the way to the recommended <br />location in the South Durham Basin, doscribed in Section S. This 6ption would temporarily <br />reduce the amount of force main and gravity sewer pipe by approximately 11,000 feet. It is <br />expected that this alternative discharge point will only haVe sufficient capacity tO receive <br />wastewater flows iu the oempternu and that the additional force main Would bo needed iothe <br />future. The force main and pump ntatinuvvyu]dot�\bmdo5iQuodto handle future flows mothat <br />»vheuthe discharge point into the Ci , n wastewater ayotetuneeds tube relocated tothe <br />rncoozomeodedlocodouintbeSoutbDurbusbBuniu,tboexi#iogforcmcndiuvvooljobh/buveto <br />be extended (i.e. not upgraded). Additional modeling and engineering evaluation will be <br />required to determine where and how much wastewater flow can be discharged to the <br />alternative location iu the City /osystem. <br />8-2 With <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.