Orange County NC Website
7 <br />1 Commissioner Pelissier asked if monitoring done by other organizations is recognized <br />2 by the state. <br />3 Tom Davis said the results of monitoring done by other organizations will be included in <br />4 the modeling that is being done. <br />5 Pam Hemminger said both of these will be taken into the monitoring project, and the <br />6 data will be recorded as group data from the sites. <br />7 Commissioner McKee said he realizes this is a drinking water source that needs to be <br />8 clean. He asked if he is correct that the best management practices that were put into place in <br />9 the 70's, 80's and 90's will not count. <br />10 Pam Hemminger said anything done before 2006 does not count. She said there will be <br />11 some credit for a few things that have been done, but there are only 5 or 6 things on the list <br />12 right now for credits. <br />13 Tom Davis said the other consideration is that the best management practices have <br />14 lowered the base line loading for the lake. <br />15 Pam Hemminger said it is frustrating because Orange County went out of their way to <br />16 put best practices in place. She said most of the land in the watershed in Orange County is <br />17 forested land, and staff is hopeful that the re- modeling will help them significantly. <br />18 Commissioner McKee said over the past 40 years the agricultural community has put in <br />19 thousands of miles of fill borders, waterways, and sediment control structures that should count <br />20 for something. He said the farmers want to keep the nutrients on their land. <br />21 Commissioner McKee asked if the first water quality test on these sites is considered a <br />22 base line. <br />23 Tom Davis said no. He said many of these locations will be sampled every month to get <br />24 results during different stages of stream flow, and this will be input into a model. <br />25 Pam Hemminger said this data will be compared against the 2006 numbers to possibly <br />26 come back with more reachable numbers. <br />27 Commissioner McKee said this means 2006 is the baseline. <br />28 Tom Davis said this is correct, and the best practices previously put in place will lower <br />29 that baseline. <br />30 Commissioner McKee said his other concern is that the financial impact of this will not <br />31 only affect the County; but it will also flow back to farmers and homeowners in the form of <br />32 additional rules and monitoring. <br />33 Commissioner Gordon expressed her appreciation for the work that has been done. <br />34 She asked if there has been any thought about the quality of what is being produced in these <br />35 areas. She said forested land should be lowest in putting out nutrients. She questioned <br />36 whether the County would fare better if this was measured on some absolute amount of <br />37 nutrients coming out. <br />38 Pam Hemminger said that is one of the reasons that the state decided to do this as a <br />39 group project. She said every jurisdiction wants to know if they have a problem that needs to <br />40 be fixed. She is hopeful that Orange County will find out that it is doing pretty well, but the <br />41 problem is that the lake is still dirty. She said maybe the Lake was just never intended to be a <br />42 water drinking source at the upper end. She said the lake is clean and drinkable at the lower <br />43 end where Raleigh pulls the water out. She said most of the land in Orange County is forested, <br />44 but there are also failing septic systems along the routes and some agriculture. She said <br />45 everything will be measured by what is in the lake, but the state has agreed to look at the data <br />46 from the jurisdictions. <br />47 Chair Jacobs asked if there are discussions about giving local governments more <br />48 authority to intervene. He asked if there has been discussion about recommendations to <br />49 change how jurisdictions do business and development in watershed areas. <br />