Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:25:19 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 10:07:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-18-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-043 Ordinance Approving Proposed Zoning Text Amendments Requiring Neighborhood Information Meetings for All Special Use Permit Applications
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-074 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A Planning Board member wanted to establish a minimum and <br />maximum timeframe for the notification of a NIM and the scheduling <br />of a public hearing. The concern was the NIM could be held and <br />then an applicant delay the scheduling of a hearing thereby limiting <br />participation of adjacent property owners in the review process due <br />to the delay. <br />STAFF COMMENT: As written a NIM is held 45 days prior to the <br />public hearing where an item is scheduled to be heard. <br />There is not a major delay with respect to the holding of the <br />neighborhood meeting and the review of an application at the public <br />hearing. <br />Staff would argue that if an applicant requests a delay in the review <br />of a SUP application (i.e. moving the project from the February to <br />November quarterly public hearings) a second NIM would be <br />required in advance of the new hearing date. <br />After review the Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the text <br />amendment as presented. A copy of the approved minutes can be found <br />in Attachment 4. A signed statement of consistency indicating the proposed <br />amendment is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan is contained <br />within Attachment 5. <br />November 18, 2014 - Receive Planning Board recommendation. <br />d. Other <br />N/A <br />2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br />a. Planning Board Review: <br />July 2, 2014 — Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). <br />October 8, 2014 — Recommendation <br />b. Advisory Boards: <br />N/A <br />c. Local Government Review: <br />Review of the proposal by the Town(s) <br />of Chapel Hill and Carrboro consistent <br />with the Joint Planning Agreement <br />(JPA) as the amendment will impact <br />projects in the Rural Buffer. Items <br />were sent on July 31, 2014. <br />At this time we have received no <br />written comments. Town of Carrboro <br />staff has verballv indicated thev have <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.