Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:25:19 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 10:07:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-18-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-043 Ordinance Approving Proposed Zoning Text Amendments Requiring Neighborhood Information Meetings for All Special Use Permit Applications
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-074 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R <br />applicable parties of the test, which they are already required to <br />send and pay for, that the meeting will also serve the function of <br />reviewing the application review process. <br />• Who runs the meeting? <br />STAFF COMMENT: Staff calls the meeting to order to review the <br />application review process and then turns it over to the applicant to <br />discuss the project. <br />September 8, 2014 Quarterly Public Hearing. This item was reviewed at the <br />hearing where the following questions /comments were made: <br />• BOCC and Planning Board members indicated they believed <br />holding a NIM 30 days prior to the public hearing, where a special <br />use permit was set for review, would not provide sufficient notice to <br />adjacent property owners of the hearing or review process. <br />There was consensus that holding the NIM 45 days in advance of <br />the public hearing would be more appropriate. <br />STAFF COMMENT. The change has been incorporated. This will <br />increase the time currently associated with the submittal and review <br />of special use permit application by approximately 50 to 60 days. <br />• A BOCC member suggested the NIM be held in the evening rather <br />than during the day. <br />STAFF COMMENT. The UDO does not specify the time (i.e. day or <br />evening) a NIM is held. Departmental policy has been to hold the <br />meeting during normal business hours. <br />Staff reminded the Board that complaints have been received over <br />the holding of similar meetings during normal business hours, as <br />people who want to attend them work, as well as at night, as people <br />do not drive at night or the meeting conflicts with family activities or <br />with an individuals work schedule. <br />No matter when the hearing is held there is the potential for <br />criticism. <br />• A BOCC member suggested that staff provide periodic updates on <br />the Planning Department website on applications being submitted <br />and where such applications are in the review process. <br />STAFF COMMENT: Information shall be provided as suggested. <br />• A BOCC member asked staff to clarify current NIM requirements. <br />STAFF COMMENT. A meeting is held: <br />1. 14 days prior to the Planning Board review of a Major <br />Subdivision Concept Plan application, <br />2. 14 days Prior to the submittal of any Zoning <br />Compliance Permit application proposing a <br />F. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.