Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-18-2014 - 5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:25:19 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 10:07:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-18-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-043 Ordinance Approving Proposed Zoning Text Amendments Requiring Neighborhood Information Meetings for All Special Use Permit Applications
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-074 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br />Approved 11/5/14 <br />people within 500 feet of the property, if you extend that to 1000 feet you would quite frankly only have captured 20 <br />or 30 additional properties owners. Some of which were there because of the advertising signs we had put out at the <br />property. <br />Tony Blake: I invite people to do the research and look and see roughly how many notices you actually sent out on <br />these in the rural areas. I think you'll see it 2, 3, 4 people. <br />Michael Harvey: I don't dispute that there are situations where you have areas with large properties where even a <br />1000 feet wouldn't make much difference. <br />Tony Blake: I understand that registered mail is a cost. It seems to me like there could be other ways to <br />communicate. Those are my comments. <br />Michael Harvey: Ok <br />Paul Guthrie: I want to go the other way, I think the bigger problem may be in urbanizing areas in terms of the costs. <br />I thought about our house and it is on a less than one acre lot and under the 500 foot rule, everywhere except one <br />location you'd pick up maybe 6 or 8 maybe 10 houses. Right across from us is a condominium with about 25 units. <br />So to do anything that requires a Special Use Permit, the homeowner would maybe need 35 registered letters. I can <br />conceive of this in a larger or fringe of an urban area having a high density property of one property among many <br />others that could raise the costs for the applicant significantly. I am a little concerned about what that does to the <br />small, not to the large corporate well - financed organization, but the small organization that for one reason or another <br />needs a Special Use Permit. Assuming it is compatible with the general character of the neighborhood, having to <br />spend that money. <br />Michael Harvey: Again, Mr. Blake is not incorrect and you're not incorrect either. There are pros and cons to both <br />sides of the equation. <br />Bryant Warren: I noticed in the past when you get ready to do something there are signs put up all around the <br />neighborhood and area, even if we stick with the 500 feet that should be sufficient enough especially if you continue <br />putting the signs up. <br />Laura Nicholson: Not to belabor the point, but isn't there a way to just conditionally make it 500 feet for an urban <br />area but as a rural area make it larger? That way it's not changing the whole fabric, could you change it depending <br />on.. <br />Michael Harvey: I don't know how comfortable I would be with that because that gives greater utility to a Class 2 <br />Kennel for example locating in one area in the County versus another area in the County. I think that I'm going to err <br />on the side of caution and treat all applicants the same. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Actually, I'll comment on that, we seem to run into this problem a lot that we almost need a settled <br />density function. Something that tells you how dense is this and that is used as criteria for notification area. The <br />problem with that is you can argue over a number, you can argue over a function and whatever you come up with <br />people putting up kennels will gain the system to do what they want. It's one of those difficult problems that never <br />have a right answer. <br />Craig Benedict: As part of our discussion more recently about the use of technology and how to get information out <br />to people different than the mailings, definitely the signs on the property so we are going to start putting our <br />application out there. Evidently there'll be some mapping and that could be with that and people will see the signs <br />and be able to look on line to see what's happening. I think we'll use technology, even the statutes are saying that <br />how we advertise is being liberalized to include media. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Tony you talked about a sample window. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.