Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1995 - IX-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 06-05-95
>
Agenda - 06-05-1995 - IX-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 4:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/13/2014 4:31:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950605
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
NSN ORD-1995-005 Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance - Agenda 6-5-1995 - IX-A
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN-01-1995 13:50 FROM ORANGE CTY COMMISSIONERS TO 3002 P.07/08 <br /> LN 7 13 <br /> DUBIE WASLBN supports the pro increase and asked that <br /> the Board of County Commissioners ap ve $1,500. She presented a <br /> petition with 57 signatures which r as follows: <br /> We, the undersigned, althoigh unable to attend the <br /> public hearing on May 25, 2995, urge the orange county <br /> Commissioners to: <br /> 1. increase the impact f on new residential <br /> construction to $1,500 immediately; <br /> 2. carry out a survey thi summer to establish <br /> representative student-generation ra s for new residences; and <br /> 3. establish an appropria sliding scale for impact <br /> fees as anon as possible thereafter, o incorporate local school <br /> construction standards and newly estaDlished student-generation <br /> rates. <br /> She feels it is not unfair to aic new residential growth to <br /> share the cost of the impact on the ools. She asked that the <br /> fee be increased to $1,500 for the C pel Hill-Carrboro District. <br /> she presented an article which expl how Atlanta plays the <br /> impact-fee game. The article says t t the fees have been a major <br /> way for then to do things they coul t have done otherwise. <br /> LEON NEYERS spoke against finan public education with an <br /> impact fee. He feels that public ed tion is part of government <br /> and benefits the entire community an should be funded by the <br /> entire community. He urged the Boar of County Commissioners to <br /> be honest and rational in their deci on on impact fees. He <br /> asked that the Board take advantage all the hard work done by <br /> the Planning Department and make the ight decision. <br /> PATRICK MULKEY spoke against th impact fee as it is <br /> currently designed. He will remain mint the impact fee until <br /> County spending is brought under con of including both school <br /> systems. He fools that increasing impact fee is the easy way <br /> out, cutting the budget and setting a money aside for future <br /> capital needs takes some action by Board of County <br /> Commissioners. He questioned which d the Board of County <br /> Commissioners will take. <br /> LISA WARREN is more against the ay that the fee is a flat <br /> fee. Her and her husband are looki into building a house and <br /> must reduce the size of the house be use of the impact fee. She <br /> feels that a lot of children are in entso. she asked that <br /> the Board of County Commissioners m the fee more fair and look <br /> at incwsmmes and other children in the ystem who are not included <br /> in the foe. <br /> SIN LLOYD feels, that orange Co should have enough money <br /> to do whatever it wants. In 1983, Economic Development <br /> Commission was created. However, tx ve years later there has not <br /> been a brick laid in the US70, 145 s thorn railway corridor. The <br /> plan should be to create some iadus al and economic growth in <br /> e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.