Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
o!�) <br /> Board have called it a commercial business. With <br /> no tax records of a commercial enterprise, he <br /> felt it was more just a collection of cars by an <br /> individual used from- time to time. <br /> Hoecke stated that he did have a business <br /> elsewhere and he was using this area as a source <br /> for parts. Waddell responded that this did not <br /> persuade him that it was a commercial use. <br /> Hamilton stated that the real business was <br /> conducted from another site. <br /> Waddell noted that this business was not <br /> inventoried and he was not convinced that it was <br /> a commercial operation. <br /> i <br /> Hoecke noted that he felt it was a commercial <br /> operation as a source for parts. <br /> Waddell stated that he was trying to view this as <br /> it would have been considered when zoning went <br /> into effect. Jobsis responded that the Board did <br /> consider that issue at the previous meeting and <br /> decided that there were parts stored there and <br /> she felt it was not reasonable to go back over <br /> the same vote. <br /> Cantrell noted that in trying to recall how the <br /> issues were dealt with in the inventory and <br /> drafting the ordinance that the Board of <br /> Commissioners were the ones who made the <br /> decisions and not the Planning Board. <br /> Four citizens whose petition was included in the <br /> agenda materials were present and asked to speak <br /> to the issue: Barton Lloyd, Gary Zadjeika, <br /> = Randall Whitehead, Linda Noonan. <br /> Mr. Lloyd noted that they were in attendance at <br /> the last two Board of Commissioners meetings even <br /> though they were not at the September 21, 1992 <br /> Planning Board meeting. He wished to clarify <br /> that at least four adjoining property owners are <br /> in opposition to the proposed zoning of Mr. Combs <br /> property to EC-5. Be continued that they felt <br /> very strongly that it is not an appropriate place <br /> for an EC-5 designation and that there is no <br /> justification for it. He continued that he felt <br /> the evidence was vague and indicated only that <br /> some cars were stored under the trees. He <br /> referred to the minutes from the previous <br /> Planning Board meeting noting that Mr. Reid had <br /> stated cars were stored on the property in 1979. <br />