Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
' n I <br /> 33 <br /> that would bring him back into line, one area <br /> r z in here could have been zoned EC-5 because of <br /> those cars stored there, then in my opinion, <br /> that is what needs to happen for that <br /> particular area. <br /> Gray said but only that particular area where <br /> he had the cars at the time can be legally <br /> zoned EC-5 . Gledhill responded or the area <br /> that would have been designated by the <br /> Planning Staff at the time which would have <br /> probably have included some regularly shaped <br /> lot which included that. I think that is a <br /> reasonable assumption. I do not recall any <br /> L-shaped zoning lots created through this <br /> process. . So it would have created some <br /> regularly shaped lot to include those cars. <br /> Eidenier asked if that lot would have had to <br /> been contiguous with property boundaries. <br /> Scearbo responded that there are quite a few <br /> EC-5 districts that are not. The zoning lot <br /> itself establishes the boundaries. <br /> Hinkley noted that if Mr. Combs closes down <br /> next week there are 43 more uses that could <br /> be permitted. He noted that some of those <br /> might not be as acceptable as a junkyard and <br /> reminded- the Board that they should look at <br /> that list of uses. The lot would not be <br /> rezoned for just this particular use but for <br /> any of those uses permitted in EC-5 including <br /> outside storage of vehicles. Hinkley <br /> proceeded to read the list of uses. <br /> Waddell asked Gledhill if it was his <br /> recollection that back in 1981 pretty much <br /> =•3 any area that was requesting an EC-5 got it <br /> or did they do a lot of selection. Gledhill <br /> responded that there were some commercial <br /> uses for reasons that I can no longer recall <br /> were not zoned EC-5 . The vast majority of <br /> them were zoned EC-5. I don't remember which <br /> ones were not zoned EC-5 but left as non- <br /> conforming. <br /> Cantrell stated that she remembered it was a <br /> long meticulous process and Gledhill agreed <br /> noting that those EC-5 zones were all hand <br /> =; picked. <br /> MOTION: Waddell stated that he found that there was <br /> not, repeat not, a commercial enterprise on <br /> this property in 1981. Therefore, he moved <br />