Orange County NC Website
depending on factors involved in selling the debt and paying off future debt, they will probably <br /> be able to issue another $100 million within 7 years after the first bond. <br /> Commissioner McKee said any tax increase associated with the bond would be above <br /> any normal tax increase driven by increase in budget. <br /> Clarence Grier said the tax increase would relate to just the debt service amounts. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked if there is any thought about when the Board of County <br /> Commissioners should discuss which schedule needs to be followed. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said based on the timelines, staff would come to the Board of <br /> County Commissioners to request a work session to discuss this. She said she and Clarence <br /> Grier are in contact with the schools as they move forward with this process. She said there is <br /> no recommendation set in stone. She said the difference will be the preference of the Board <br /> of Commissioners and the school boards. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the Board has not created the bond group yet. He said this has <br /> been discussed at their school collaboration meetings, and it will be a topic at the retreat. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she raised this question because the economic climate is <br /> different now than from what it was in 2001, and more time may be needed to do the <br /> educational campaign. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if the way the bond committee ran in 2001 was considered <br /> successful, or if there were any lessons learned. <br /> Chair Halkiotis said he was there in 2001, and he agrees with Commissioner Gordon. <br /> He said the process should start early regardless of the bond date that is chosen. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the 2001 process was successful, and the schools had a prominent <br /> voice at the table. He said there is no reason not to be cautious, as it is a different time, but he <br /> thinks people will get this. He said the Board would need a decision item in June 2015 to get <br /> the group started prior to the Board of County Commissioners Meeting in August 2015. <br /> Chair Jacobs noted that most of their bonds in the past have been driven by the <br /> schools. <br /> Chair Bedford said timing makes a big difference, but it is very difficult to plan until you <br /> know how much money you have to work with. She hopes the following presentation will help <br /> explain the dilemma. <br /> Todd Lofrese the Board has already received their report and approved the overall <br /> recommendations for the ten oldest facilities. He reviewed the following PowerPoint slides: <br /> CHCCS Older Facilities Summary <br /> • Older schools need significant investments <br /> • Recommendations <br /> — Fix aging infrastructure issues <br /> — Bring older schools to OC standard <br /> — Address safety and security <br /> — Increase capacity and delay new schools <br /> — Delays operational increases <br /> • Timing is important <br /> • Continued collaboration <br /> Facilities Assessment Recommendation and Differed Cost of New Schools <br /> • Recommendations increase student capacity as follows: <br /> • Carrboro Elementary + 52 <br /> • Ephesus +137 <br /> • Estes Hills + 58 <br />