Orange County NC Website
I Michelle Brownstein arrived at 7:22:47 p.m. <br />2 <br />3 Tom Forcella said their entire instructional plan is based on instructional excellence. He <br />4 said this is rooted in the principle of a growth mindset, which believes that all students have the <br />5 ability to achieve at much higher levels, given proper instruction; classrooms that focus on <br />6 thinking and problem solving; teachers who plan effectively; a coordinated curriculum; and best <br />7 instructional practices. He said this is the charge of the long range plan. <br />8 Tom Forcella said there is a requirement that every school district in N.C. must create a <br />9 merit based pay plan for submission to the legislature by January 15th. He said this has been <br />10 altered so that districts can sign off and not submit a plan. He said there have been <br />11 conversations with staff about what can be done to make a difference, and why the current plan <br />12 is based on years of experience versus professional growth, collaboration and what is going on <br />13 in the classrooms. He said they are looking at a system that does not use merit based pay that <br />14 pits one teacher against another, but instead provides opportunities for staff for leadership and <br />15 career advancement. He said the goal is to create a system to sustain the good work that they <br />16 do. <br />17 Tom Forcella said the state's effort to create a merit based program is actually providing <br />18 an opportunity for the district to create a system that looks a lot better. He said the state has <br />19 said they will accept 7 -10 pilot programs, and the district hopes to submit and be one of those <br />20 professional growth plans. <br />21 <br />22 Todd Lofrese expressed appreciation for the additional local support from the <br />23 Commissioners and the Orange County tax payers. He presented the following PowerPoint <br />24 budget slides: <br />25 <br />26 Budget Highlights <br />27 Strong local support helped buffer continued state reductions <br />28 We no longer have positions on fund balance <br />29 Most teachers received a sizable raise (average -5.5 %) <br />30 All employees were provided the equivalent of a 3% increase <br />31 Funded signing bonuses for critical needs <br />32 <br />33 Budget Lowlights <br />34 Continued state reductions in the areas of central office, transportation, at -risk, and <br />35 teacher assistants <br />36 Signing bonuses: State raise announced too late <br />37 Teacher turnover at 15.8 %, highest since 1998 <br />38 Reductions needed to balance: <br />39 - Central Office (salaries, 1 PT position, contracted services) <br />40 - Delayed Guidance Program Review <br />41 - Part -Time Gifted Specialists (11 PT positions) <br />42 - Teacher Assistants (22 FT positions) <br />43 - Part -Time Custodians (15 PT positions) <br />44 <br />45 State Funding Changes Since 2008 -09 <br />46 Total appropriations up $60 Million <br />47 Salary and benefit costs up $1.3 Billion <br />48 Net impact: Classrooms reduced by over $1 Billion <br />49 Loss of teacher positions, teacher assistant positions, administrative positions, supplies, <br />50 and support <br />