Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-06-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 11-06-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-06-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 3:04:36 PM
Creation date
11/6/2014 8:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-06-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br />1 Commissioner Dorosin said he would like to see that information. He would also like to <br />2 see what the (CHCCS) contracted employees are being paid. He would like to see this <br />3 information for all of the governmental entities. <br />4 Commissioner McKee said he would like to see a break down between full time and <br />5 part -time employees. <br />6 Commissioner Rich asked if OCS has any contracted employees. <br />7 Interim Superintendent Del Burns said yes <br />8 Commissioner Rich said she would like to see that information as well. She said The <br />9 Board of County Commissioners has had many discussions about making sure all employees, <br />10 salaried and contracted, are being treated fairly. <br />11 Chair Jacobs said Orange County can report information on its contracted employees as <br />12 well, so that everyone is in the same boat. <br />13 <br />14 5. Possible Bond Issuance for May 2016 or November 2016 Referendum <br />15 Chair Jacobs said a large part of the impetus for discussing this was the older school <br />16 facilities needs. He said this will not be bitten off in one bond issue, but it is time to get started. <br />17 Clarence Grier reviewed the following background information: <br />18 <br />19 Background: In recent meetings over the past fiscal year, the Board of County Commissioners <br />20 has discussed the need for a future bond referendum to fund some County and School long - <br />21 range capital needs. This item was also discussed at the September 16 2014 County /School <br />22 Collaboration Meeting. Due to recent changes enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly <br />23 related to the dates in which a general obligation bond referendum can be held, a general <br />24 obligation bond referendum can only be held on even numbered years. <br />25 <br />26 He said therefore, there are only two possible dates for the Board of County Commissioners to <br />27 conduct a voter approved general obligation bond referendum — May 2016 and November <br />28 2016. If not held at one of these dates, a potential general obligation bond referendum can only <br />29 be held in May 2018 or November 2018. Bob Jessup, Orange County Bond Counsel, and <br />30 Orange County staff have provided a schedule with a brief timeline comparison related to both <br />31 dates (Attachment a). <br />32 The previous time that Orange County held a general obligation bond referendum was in <br />33 November of 2001. The bond referendum totaled $75 million and the items included on the <br />34 referendum were as follows: <br />35 • School related projects totaling $47 million. <br />36 • Parks and Recreation projects totaling $20 million <br />37 • Senior Center projects totaling $ 4 million <br />38 • Low and moderate income projects (Affordable Housing) totaling $4 million <br />39 <br />40 All of the individual items on the bond referendum passed in the November 2001 bond <br />41 referendum. The total bond referendum passed with an average approval rate of approximately <br />42 55 percent. Additionally, some of the steps included in the process to prepare for the general <br />43 obligation bonds referendum were as follows: <br />44 <br />45 1. The Board of County Commissioners decided to proceed with a general obligation <br />46 bond referendum. <br />47 2. The Board of County Commissioners formed and appointed members to a Capital <br />48 Needs Task Force to make a recommendation as to the needs and components of the <br />49 bond referendum (See Attachment b). <br />50 3. Once the components of the general obligation bond referendum were decided, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.