Agenda - 11-06-2014 - 5c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

16 II 1 647 Tony Blake: Let me just suggest just opposing the whole thing for just a second here. Why not add, and I think other 648 boards have this thing that they have sort of a County Commissioner liaison. Why not require that liaison to be here 649 for quasi judicial, no quasi - judicial right? Then they can carry that feedback back to the other County 650 Commissioners. 651 652 Pete Hallenbeck: We're going to stick with the legislative, quasi-judicial is a very strict process. 653 654 Perdita Holtz: There are reasons there's not a BOCC liaison for the Planning Board and I don't think there is going to 655 be. 656 657 Pete Hallenbeck: I think the changes we're talking about is we have the 45 days, we're just saying let the public 658 come and present input either in writing or verbally at the Planning Board meeting that's part of the notification they 659 get. We will discuss it there will be times when we can make a recommendation and there will be times when we'll 660 just throw our hands up and there will probably be times when we go, we don't really want to get near this thing and 661 we kick it back to the Commissioners. 662 663 Paul Guthrie: Would that be mandatory or just advisory? Could we simply say you may wish to come to a Planning 664 Board meeting prior to the public hearing? 665 666 Pete Hallenbeck: Yes, but part of this is to explain the process, is that exact language. You're not required but if you 667 care to this is great as it gives us better input sooner, the Commissioners read your feedback before the quarterly 668 public hearing. That explanation should enough to let a citizen realize how the process works. 669 670 Paul Guthrie: Probably a good idea. 671 672 Laura Nicholson: To me there is just some things that seem really cut and dried and there are some things that are 673 really squishy. Is there a way we can delineate that and say these things we agree on and bring a recommendation 674 on these things and these things we still want to talk about more, is that a possibility? 675 676 Pete Hallenbeck: Part of why I tried to say it's important to be at the QPH not wild about the quorum and you're 677 comments you really think the quorum will help. The Planning Board taking citizen input, it sounds like everybody is 678 good with that and more input is good. We realize this is legislative that is 88% of what we see, all Planning Board 679 members get notification of any neighborhood information meetings and we realize that the quasi-judicial is a 680 problem for another day we need more education as there are very strict rules. That's ok because we've just dealt 681 with 88% of what we deal with and I would say that's the summation of what we are putting before the 682 Commissioners along with this process. 683 684 Craig Benedict: Chair, based on the direction the Commissioners gave the manager and the attorney and staff is this 685 interim report is not going to make decision so, that interim report will say probably some things are easier to achieve 686 and some things are a little bit harder so I think in essence we are going to get some ideas on which way we can 687 move with it. Where's there's some clarity and which areas might need a little more time. That's why they said the 688 November 611 meeting wouldn't have everything done by then. We'll let them know where we are in the process that 689 we were getting consensus on some areas and we are also determining that there are differences, clear differences, 690 on how the Board's role is for quasi-judicial versus legislative and how we get community input that might take a little 691 longer. 692 693 Pete Hallenbeck: That's also why we're not going to vote tonight on this and what we recommend. We've talked 694 they get to sludge through it and see what we're thinking and it goes on from there. Ok, the last item on the agenda, 695 I'll entertain a motion to adjourn 696 697 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 698 Email from Lydia Wegman: 699 13