Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-05-2008-11a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 02-05-2008
>
Agenda - 02-05-2008-11a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:02:51 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/5/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
11a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080205
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is important to note that the impact of any landfill bans will be different on each of the three <br />distinct sectors that deliver waste to the MSW Landfill (Residential, Multifamily, and <br />Commercial). Other issues that should be considered when contemplating bans include <br />enforceability, the estimated percent of the banned material that is reasonably recoverable, public <br />resistance to any potential bans, the recycling program's ability to manage the banned materials, <br />and the time and effort needed to prepare for and implement associated recycling efforts. <br />Additionally, when considering the space-saving consequences of a ban, it is important to <br />consider not only the tons of material diverted, but more importantly the volume or space that the <br />material would occupy in the landfill. While this may seem a subtle distinction, because <br />different materials behave differently when compacted and as they age . in the landfill <br />environment, a material that may generate a large tonnage diversion such as food waste may not <br />necessarily result in a large amount of space-savings due to the materials density and <br />composition. Food waste, for example, is largely water and highly compactable thus high <br />tonnage may not result in high space savings where a low density material might have the <br />opposite impact, low tonnage but higher space savings. <br />The materials staff believed could be considered for landfill bans in this report include: <br />• newspaper, <br />• glossy magazines, <br />• plastic bottles (a state-wide landfill ban comes into effect on October 1, 2009), <br />• residential corrugated cardboard (a ban of commercially (non-residential) generated <br />corrugated cardboard is already in effect), <br />• commercially produced waxed corrugated cardboard (heretofore considered "unrecyclable"), <br />• clean wood waste from the residential sector (a ban of commercially generated clean wood <br />waste is already in effect), <br />• commercial food waste from large generators, and <br />• Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) that would mostly be televisions and older computer monitors. <br />When considering the implementation of further landfill bans, it is important to consider the <br />timing, cost to implement, and amount of landfill space saved. The effort and logistics necessary <br />to put the bans in place would require staff resources from the County and the Towns and would <br />result in expenses directly to the Solid Waste enterprise fund as well as to the municipalities as <br />they make their own enforcement efforts as they've done on the RRMO. <br />Additionally, implementing all the above listed bans effectively by mid-year 2008-09 would be a <br />very ambitious goal that would only save an estimated 1.5 months of landfill space. The public <br />and waste haulers would need significant education and advanced notice prior to the <br />implementation of the bans. The original cardboard ban, passed in 1995 and first enforced in <br />1996, took over a year to implement and then another year to make fully effective after getting <br />municipalities involved and further fine-tuning. The RRMO took two years to become effective, <br />and has resulted in significant shift of construction and demolition waste tonnage from the <br />County's facility to certified private out-of-County processors for sorting as well as some <br />`sneaking away' to private landfills. <br />In terms of space-savings, different items result in different amounts of diversion and landfill <br />space saved. While implementing a ban of the lead-bearing Cathode Ray Tubes commonly <br />associated with televisions and computer monitors will not result in significant space savings, it <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.