Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-15-2008-6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 01-15-2008
>
Agenda - 01-15-2008-6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:16:11 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080115 - Late
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 12/5/07 <br />Renee Price: A question to staff; when we get these maps, could we show ownership instead of these lot lines? <br />Craufurd Goodwin: It doesn't matter. <br />Eddie Kirk: It would be hard to get a map with the owners on each lot. <br />Jay Bryan: I would like the issue of notification and the signs to come back to the board before the board. <br />Sam Lasris: We did have an answer on page 8. <br />Craufurd Goodwin: Suppose the board decided to vote against this on Sandy's grounds? <br />Sandra Quinn: This is an advisory board. <br />Brian Crawford: There is a plan and this fits within the ordinance. <br />Sandra Quinn: I have the right to disagree. <br />Brian Crawford: We have already been sued on this project. <br />Sandra Quinn: If we have voted on it, it meets the law, then why ask us. <br />Jay Bryan: For anyone who feels the ordinance or regulations are not the way they should be for a particular issue, <br />you could raise a motion that would ask that a particular situation be re-examined regarding the regulations. <br />Regarding the regulations and ordinance, there are sections that could be used to justify turning down a development <br />based on some public welfare issues. <br />Brian Crawford: It does raise a point, one thing we have to push the whole issue of alternatives of another site for <br />water and sewer. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: That opportunity presents itself with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Sandra Quinn: I would not want to punish this developer. I feel this is an advisory board and I think this should send <br />a signal to the Board of County Commissioners that we are not in agreement with this. I will continue to say it. It you <br />are telling me I can't vote that way, I won't be here. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: This is not an advisory board? This board is on the basis of statutes. <br />Jay Bryan: This is not like the Board of Adjustment so it is more general. <br />Renee Price: There was supposed to be an ordinance review committee that was put on hold. Separate issue <br />before we go on...Jay; you had asked about the Courtesy Review and it is supposed to be discussed at the Board of <br />County Commissioners meeting review in November., Will that be addressed? <br />Robert Davis: I'll ask Gene. <br />Jay Bryan: Maybe a status report on where that issue is regarding Hillsborough, Garrboro and Chapel Hill. <br />38 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.