Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-03-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 10-03-2013 - Joint Mtg. - Chief's Association
>
Agenda - 10-03-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 4:42:17 PM
Creation date
10/8/2014 3:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-03-2013
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Assessment of Emergency Medical Services 69 <br />and 911 /Communications Center Operations Study <br />2.4 ISSUES OF CONCERN <br />This section discusses the significant EMS issues of concern identified during the analyses of the various <br />data collected, the visual study of conditions found to exist, and numerous conversations and formal <br />interviews conducted over the course of the study. <br />The determination of whether or not an "issue" was identified as such was based on the assessment of <br />current operations and performance discussed in subsections 2.2 and 2.3. <br />The issues identified as being of significant concern with regards to EMS involved the following topics: <br />• Availability of ALS Ambulances <br />• Response Times <br />• EMS Facilities <br />Issue: Availability of Ambulances <br />During 2011 ambulances were directed to "MOVE" 2,360 times from their identified staging area or <br />location to another point in the County because; <br />a. The number of ambulances immediately available was down to one (1) and the subject <br />remaining ambulance was directed to move to a location typically near the center of the County <br />in anticipation of being able to respond in any direction the next call may direct; or, <br />b. In tracking the status of multiple ambulances, the Communications Center and /or EMS <br />Supervisor(s) noted significant area gaps in coverage and redirected movement of ambulance(s) <br />accordingly. <br />The practice itself is not uncommon and is referred to as system status management; locating /moving <br />ambulances to address the current level of coverage or lack thereof. <br />The risk, however, of being down to one (or "no ") ambulances is that the next emergency medical call <br />that comes in to the Communications Center may not have an ambulance available to respond. <br />Granted first responders fill a significant and vital role at this point, however, without an ambulance <br />available there is likely no ALS level of service available and in turn no means of transport available. <br />EMS Call Scenarios <br />While monitoring EMS radio traffic during onsite time in the County over the months during which this <br />study occurred, the actual announcement that "we are out of ambulances ", or "we have one ambulance <br />left" was heard numerous times. <br />In an effort to understand the specific circumstances that were resulting in such conditions, EMS call <br />logs were reviewed over several months during 2011 to identify the specific conditions that occurred <br />and the circumstances that contributed to them. <br />On several occasions, typically during the busiest hours of the day previously noted, a closely bunched <br />series of calls could be identified, each call was reviewed individually, and the "dispatch" and <br />"available" (back in service) times were documented, as was the type of call; i.e. Chest Pains, Diabetic, <br />Fall, etc. <br />Solutions for Local Government, Inc. 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.