Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:54:45 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:26:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. The rezoning and special use permit requests relate to property that is properly <br />situated and located to be served by. Interstate 1-40 and mass transit facilities;, <br />however the transportation analysis provided by the applicant fails. adequately <br />to address issues related to weekend transportation patterns and issues related <br />to Orange County residents' travel from within the County to reach the project <br />property, and insufficiently addresses. transportation issues that would arise in <br />the event the North Carolina .Department of Transportation fails to fund <br />improvements in I-40 and Buckhorn Road. <br />[Finding 2(b} was adopted by a Seven (7) to Two (2) vote] <br />3. As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any <br />proposed agreements, .contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, <br />contributions, guarantees, or other. instruments, or the need for such instruments; <br />or for amendments in those proposed (Section 7.5.4 (c)): <br />a. Orange County Planning staff has concluded that that the rezoning and SUP <br />application contains sufficient documentation indicating that the development <br />will be under unified control guaranteeing the development of the property <br />consistent with .the proposed rezoning and SUP application, but the Planning <br />Board believes that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the phases <br />of developmenfi and how the phases and aspects of development in those <br />phases will be implemented <br />[Finding 3(a) was adopted by a Seven (7) to Two (2) vote] <br />C <br />6~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.