Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:53:20 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:26:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 SECTION 7.5.4 ZONING OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATIONS (`Yes' indicates complaint.; `No' <br />indicates non-compliance) <br />ORDINANCE STAFF <br />REQUIREMENTS FINDINGS <br />At such time as further <br />conferences appear <br />unnecessary, or at any time <br />on request of the applicant, <br />the Zoning Officer shall <br />prepare a written report to <br />the Planning Board and <br />Board of County <br />Commissioners, containing <br />the following findings: <br />RECOMMENDED <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING <br />TO SUPPORT FINDINGS BOARD FINDINGS <br />(a) As to the suitability of the The Zoning Officer issued a <br />proposals for the general recommendation indicating <br />type of PD category, the that the applicant had: <br />physical characteristics <br />of the land, and. relation i. That the project is <br />of the .proposed X Yes No suitable for <br />development to - development as a <br />surrounding areas and Planned Development, <br />existing and probable ii. That the physical <br />future development; characteristics of the <br /> subject property allow <br /> for the development of <br /> such a project, <br />b) As to relation to major ~ The Zoning Officer issued a <br />roads and mass transit recommendation indicating <br />facilities, utilities and that the applicant had: <br />other facilities and <br />services; i. Is properly situated and <br />X Yes No located to be served by <br /> existing major roads <br /> and mass transit <br /> facilities, and <br /> ii. That there is, and will <br /> be, the necessary utility <br /> infrastructure available <br /> to support the proposed <br /> development. <br />c) As to the adequacy of The Zoning Officer issued a <br />evidence on unified recommendation indicating <br />control and the suitability that the applicant had <br />of any proposed demonstrated acceptable <br />agreements, contracts, methods of unified control <br />deed restrictions, to ensure the perpetual <br />sureties, dedications, X Yes No development and <br />contributions, - maintenance of the project <br />guarantees, or other as proposed. <br />instruments, or the need <br />for such instruments, or <br />for amendments in those <br />proposed; <br />S:\BOCC\2008 BOCC Agendas\06-03-OB\Buckhorn Village\Attachment 4.doc <br />^Yes No <br />_Yes No <br />Yes No <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.