Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - 5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - Assembly of Governments
>
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 12:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/7/2014 10:16:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-21-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 3: Base Zoning Districts 9 <br />Section 3.8: Conditional Districts <br />• . <br />:fill 1142;1 BEIN . <br />1 <br />. . <br />Lot size, min., peruse <br />40,000 [1] <br />(square feet) <br />Lot Width, min. (feet) <br />150 <br />- • <br />Front Setback from <br />40 <br />ROW, min. (feet) <br />The purpose of the Agricultural Support Enterprises (ASE -CZ) <br />Side Setback, min. <br />20 [2] <br />District is to provide for agriculturally - related activities that are not <br />(feet) <br />considered bona fide farming activities within the County's planning <br />Rear Setback, min. <br />20 [2] <br />jurisdiction. <br />(feet) <br />APPLICABILITY <br />Height, max. (feet) <br />45 [3] <br />Floor Area Ratio, max <br />No requirement [4] <br />The district shall be located in such a manner as to be compatible <br />Required Open Space <br />with the character of existing development of surrounding properties, <br />Ratio, min. <br />No requirement [4] <br />thus insuring the continued conservation of building values and <br />encouraging the most appropriate use of land in the county. <br />Required Livability <br />No requirement [4] <br />Therefore, when evaluating an application for this district, emphasis <br />Space Ratio, min. <br />shall be given to the location of the proposed development, the <br />relationship of the site and site development plan to adjoining <br />property, and the development itself.4 <br />Required Recreation <br />No requirement [4] <br />Space Ratio, min. <br />DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES: <br />[1] Lot size for individual uses shall be appropriate to the method of <br />water supply and sewage disposal. <br />[2] Required side and rear setbacks adjacent to residentially zoned <br />land shall be equal to the required side or rear setback of the <br />Required Pedestrian / <br />No requirement [4] <br />adjacent residential district. <br />Landscape Ratio, min. <br />[3] Two feet of additional height shall be allowed for one foot <br />increase of the required front and side setbacks. <br />[4] The overall development will be evaluated to ensure compatibility <br />with surrounding properties and with planning objectives. <br />DEVELOPMENT ASE-CZ DISTRICT SPECIFIC DA-D <br />1. Uses shall be restricted to those indicated for the ASE -CZ District in Section 5.2. Additionally, non - residential uses <br />are restricted based on the Watershed Protection Overlay District in which the property is located. Refer to Section <br />4.2.3 for land use restrictions. <br />2. Development within the zoning district shall be subject to all applicable use standards detailed in Article 5 and all <br />applicable development standards detailed in Article 6 of this Ordinance. <br />3. The residential density permitted on a given parcel is based on the Watershed Protection Overlay District in which <br />the property is located. Refer to Section 4.2.4 for a breakdown of the allowable density (i.e., the number of <br />individual dwellings that can be developed on a parcel of property). The ASE -CZ district is not intended for <br />residential uses such as subdivisions. Any residential uses are to be occupied by the operator of the associated <br />3 These standards are consistent with other existing zoning district such as AR and AS and /or are consistent with <br />how other CZ districts are handled. <br />4 This statement is consistent with the statements made for other CZ districts. <br />5 Consistent with how similar uses /zoning districts are written. <br />6 These are typical of other zoning districts and seek to direct users to other applicable sections of the UDO. #3 <br />also clarifies that residential uses in the ASE -CZ district are incidental <br />Orange County, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance Page 3 -64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.