Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
~A 8 <br />~I~i~~ <br />CONSULTING ' <br />'" ENGINEERING ID ARCHITECTURE a SURYEYtNG <br />21.Appendix D - Wha pays for the auxiliary lane from the weigh station on <br />ramp to Buckhorn Road off ramp? <br />Response: All pr®posed improvements that are needed to supporfi the <br />development of Buckhorn Village are the responsibility of the developer. <br />22. Will NGDOT conduct traffic assessments on West 10 and 70 West? <br />Response: The current submitted Traffic Impact Analysis shalC be amended <br />to include these areas if required. <br />23.Appendix D- Arcadis G&M -The November 2007 traffic counts were all <br />made on weekdays. Why weren't weekend counts performed? <br />Response: Counts are currently only far weekdays, we have requested that <br />our traffic consultant include a set of weekend counts in the TIA. The vast <br />majority of the current traffic on weekends is generated by the Jockey lot, <br />which will not be operating once the Buckhorn Village is developed. <br />;' <br />24. Chapter 1, bottom of page 8 - "Should land use of adjacent properties <br />change, access into the properties can be established". I only see one <br />stubout to the East. Will there be other stubouts? <br />Response: The requested zoning is compliant with the EDD and Land Use <br />Ilan. No other stub-outs are planned, as the remainder of the property is <br />bordered by existing roads and the existing Clearview subdivision. <br />25. Exhibit 2 -Will there be a "wall" to prevent Clear View Subdivisions from <br />entering on foot or bicycle directly fram the south. Is there a utility line <br />easement or path between 36 and 37? <br />Response: At this time a wall along the Glear View Subdivision is not <br />planned or required. The access to lots 2 and 3 are between tots 36 and 37 <br />of Clear View Subdivision. This is not a utility easement. <br />March 19, 2008 <br />