Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2012 11:48:05 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:25:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br />~' 1 Energy Policy Act of 1992 fixture performance requirements. This is an obtainable goal, and if <br />2 they're asked to do this, you'll find that it's possible. It's being done in State buildings right now. <br />3 And 30% energy efficient. <br />4 <br />5 There's more for you to read in the submittal, but this is the gist. Thank you. : . <br />6 <br />7 Ruffin Slater: I have been sworn. I'm the General-Manager of Weaver Street Market, we have <br />8 grocery stores in Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and soon we'll have one in Hillsborough. I've been <br />9 involved in economic development in the County for the last 20 years as a businessperson. I've <br />10 been on various boards and commissions, including serving as the Chair of the Economic <br />11 Development Commission, where {became familiar with retail leakage and other economic <br />12 development issues. While this project may provide solutions to some economic development <br />13 challenges, it may well exacerbate others. I urge you to consider the project's net economic <br />14 impact and whether or not it will truly be beneficial for our local economy. While it's likely a <br />15 development of this size will attract some stores that we don't have in the County, it's equally <br />16 likely it will house other businesses that.are in direct competition to our traditional, downtown. <br />17 Southpoint has. had a dramatic negative impact on our downtown businesses; not just retail, but <br />18 restaurant and entertainment businesses. Another center of this size on the other side of our <br />19 downtowns will further erode the fortunes of our downtown businesses, especially in <br />20 Hillsborough and Mebane. This development is specifically sited to attract national chains, <br />21 which, although they pay the same taxes as local businesses, beyond that, have dramatically <br />22 different economic impact. About 85 cents of every dollar spent in the national chain leaves our <br />23 community, and the 15 cents that stays typically goes to pay low-wage jobs. By contrast, about <br />24 50 cents of every dollar spent in a local business stays in the community and supports other <br />25 local businesses and typically pays higher wages. I urge you to consider the true economic <br />26 impact of this project, the impact not just on new business, but the impact on existing business, <br />27 and also to consider the difference in the economic impact on national chains and local <br />28 businesses. . <br />29 <br />30 Janine Zanin: I'm a property. owner on Timberwood Trail in Efland. I was sworn. I have not <br />31 yet made up my mind about how I feel about this development. I came here tonight to learn <br />32 more about the developers' intent and just to get some specifics. I am leaving here with some <br />33 questions that I'd like to ask, and also some concerns that I didn't have before I came. There's <br />34 been a lot of talk about two different ideas, one is keeping Orange County dollars in Orange <br />35 County and getting Orange County residents to stay at home for their shopping. On the <br />36 surface, this sounds like a fabulous idea. I question whether this specific location is appropriate <br />37 for that goal. We just built some new.soccer fields next to the middle school, and all I've been <br />3$ reading in the paper is about how the folks in Chapel Hill don't want to drive to those soccer <br />39 fields. f'm not really convinced that they're going to want to come to the Buckhorn Village <br />40 shopping area. I do think that one thing that might encourage that travel is if this was a unique, <br />41 green, local development. I haven't heard who's going to be there, 1 haven't heard enough <br />42 details to really make up my own mind whether I think that's what it's going to be. I did move <br />43 and buy property though in Orange County because I trust the leaders of Orange County more <br />44 than surrounding counties to base their decisions on priorities of Orange County residents, and I <br />45 think you've heard some of them here today. Those are transportation issues, the environment, <br />46 and keeping local folks in good business. One thing {heard that concerned me today, that I <br />47 hope is not the goal of the developers, is that one of the great things about developing this <br />48 particular location is that they will access the 84,000 cars a day that travel through the area <br />49 without degradation to the rest of Orange County. Does this mean that they're going to be <br />50 degrading the place where I live? And I certainly hope that's not the case and that it's not the <br />51 intention of the developers. That was one of my concerns, a lot of what's been in the paper and <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.