Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2012 11:48:05 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:25:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~~ <br />30 <br />1 Raleigh and Piedmont NCDA farmers' markets are currently at capacity, both for growers and <br />2 for buyers. Buckhorn is sited between these two giant markets, drawing people from <br />3 Greensboro to Durham, actually decreasing the amount of driving necessary for residents of <br />4 Orange, Alamance, Caswell, and Person Counties, which would shop or sell there. While the <br />5 individual farmers' markets in Carrboro, Hillsborough, and Durham are quite successful on the <br />6 weekends and selective evenings in season, there is no local daily market or private outlet such <br />7 as Weaver Street or Whole Foods for growers to sell wholesale. These .individual farmers' <br />8 markets cannot keep up with current demand, either from consumers or from growers that <br />9 would like to sell there. A regional farmers' market/restaurant/artist gallery complex at Buckhorn <br />10 would not only draw more people to Buckhorn Village, but would encourage Buckhorn Village <br />11 patrons to spend some money at the vendors that would be more likely to keep that money <br />12 local. A farmers' .market retail space for locally-produced items would make this project a whole <br />13 lot more palatable to many of us that live in the area. <br />14 <br />15 Robin Taylor-Half: I have been sworn in. My family has actually lived in this County at least <br />16 five generations. ('m a taxpayer, and I represent the Efland heirs, which Efland was' named <br />17 after. They are very excited that this project has been proposed. They have 180 acres in the <br />18 EDD, and they also have another 80 acres that is a proposed commercial development. This <br />19 was from the water and sewer that is moving in the area and just growth and money that would <br />20 be coming to the County. So they wanted me to speak and say that they are very much in favor <br />21 of this project. Martha Brown, I represent her too, she also is in favor of the project. <br />22 <br />23 Tom (3'Dwyer: 1 have been sworn in. I serve on the Orange County Commission for the <br />24 Environment, I'm a member of the U. S. Green Building Council, and I am an avid believer in <br />25 principles of sustainabi(ity, where the economic, environmental, and social impacts of our <br />26 actions are measured for our future. As a design builder and small developer, I am a committed <br />27 participant in an architecture program called the 2030 initiative, where everything 1 build is 50% <br />28 energy efficient. I'm finding we can do it. This is why I personally believe, this is an aside, I <br />29 personally believe that sustainability should not only be a policy, but it should be institutionalized <br />30 for the purpose of coordinating and implementing adopted goals with developments such as <br />31 these. More on this subject hopefully in the future. Regarding the Commission for the <br />32 Environment's letter that you all have a copy of, 1'll give some highlights about it. The proposed <br />33 Buckhorn development would be located in the Seven-Mile Creek area of the Upper Eno <br />34 Protected Watershed. Now, we can reduce the environmental impact of a large complex such <br />35 as this by streamlining traffic flow, reducing vehicle miles traveled, reducing wastes through less <br />36 generation and recycling, and encourage water and energy efficiencies and low-impact design <br />37 principles. In our advisory role to the Board of Commissioners on environmental matters, the <br />38 Commission recommends the following: <br />39 Plan and build according to the LEED Neighborhood Development Standard, at a minimum <br />40 using the current LEED ND pilot standards. Right now, they're not accepting anymore <br />41 programs, but one of the developers here is participating in East 54, and they're using LEED ND <br />42 guidelines for that development. I feel .it's important that there should be a set of standards that <br />43 you ask them to follow. There is a historical tract of developers and builders at UNC and other <br />44 places, I'm not accusing these .people of anything, they are doing good things, but sometimes <br />45 what people say they're going to do, does .not verify. So commissioning verification of the things <br />46 that are standards can be asked of you to these developers. So, what we're recommending is <br />47 the LEED ND pilot standards for the revised adopted standard plan for release in 2009. You <br />48 have an attachment of the guidelines and frequently asked questions about what that is about. <br />49 These standards address things in transportation, bicycle use, bicycle storage for commercial <br />50 and residential, reduction of water. Commission for the Environment is recommending a 30% <br />51 less use of water than the water use baseline calculated for the building after meeting the <br /> <br />i~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.