Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2012 11:48:05 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:25:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />25 <br />1 economies as opposed to importing big guys. I was deeply impressed by the quality of your <br />~ 2 presentation, particularly along the sustainability lines; (think his four suggestions or <br />3 modifications to encourage the local businesses would make a big difference. I previously <br />4 submitted a document that has a summary of my concerns, plus some of the evidence. So I <br />S hope that will get into your packet. I would say that I see Buckhorn as an important issue <br />6 because it highlights the tough choices we're facing as how to best build long-term economic <br />7 vitality for all regions of Orange County and all its constituencies, bath rural and town. The <br />8 question for me is less how many shoppers are we -going to get into Orange County, but how <br />9 many kinds of things is Orange County going to be producing, what kind of services we're going <br />10 to be adding that we can sell to other people and exchange among ourselves. I am very <br />11 impressed with how thoughtfully this project has been developed and researched, but I also <br />12 have to say that, unfortunately, there is good reason to believe that this research is based on an <br />13 economic development model that is in the process of failing nationally and globally, and <br />14 certainly at locations across this country. I see it as a terrible mistake to try to apply it here, <br />15 especially in light of the increasing problems of peak oil, of drought, and of global warming. So, <br />16 the evidence, as I see it, suggests that Buckhorn Village is likely to do more economic harm <br />17 than good. Current economic theory places a huge emphasis on GDP growth and the large <br />18 corporation and development projects that increase it most. About 30 years ago this emphasis <br />19 spawned, an economic development strategy that has been irreverently named "The Big Game <br />20 Hunting Project." That is; using incentives fio lure big manufacturers, retailers, and other large <br />21 corporations, which officials hope will bring in jobs and tax revenues. Unfortunately, while this <br />22 strategy may increase tax revenues in the short-term, research shows that it erodes the <br />23 surrounding local economic networks, siphons away local dollars, and costs more in tax dollars <br />24 infrastructure overhead, increased pollution, and lost jobs than the local businesses that it <br />25 destroys. Unless we can make allowances for creating local enterprise networks I suspect that <br />126 Buckhorn is less an advantage than a detriment. <br />27 <br />28 Bill Bunch: I have been sworn in. I'm here tonight as a resident of Orange County and also as <br />29 a Certified Public Accountant and a local business owner. I'm also Chair of the Chapel Hill- <br />30 Carrboro Chamber of Commerce. I'd like to applaud the Commissioners for your foresight in <br />31 putting an economic development district right beside a major transportation artery many years <br />32 ago. The projected sales tax revenue, $5 or $6 million, from this project will materially increase <br />33 the County sales tax base. And the projected $125 million in commercial property value will <br />34 materially increase the projected property tax revenue. These funds can be used to pay for <br />35 school teachers. There is. significant pressure from the two school boards for the County to fund <br />36 schools at a regional level, and fihisproject would bring more revenue that would fund a lot of <br />37 school teachers. We're using local developers, and I applaud Buckhorn Associates. The <br />38 project is being developed by some of the best and brightest developers in the area who are <br />39 sensitive to the culture and desires of the citizens; they have experience doing very high-quality <br />40 mixed-use projects. This isn't outside developers coming into town, these are our local Orange <br />41 County developers, and we support that. We encourage proactive collaboration with the~County <br />42 and also the local neighbors -with Efland, with Mebane, with the Town of Chapel Hill, with <br />43 Carrboro, with Hillsbarough, the Hillsborough Chamber of Commerce, and the Chapel Hill- <br />44 Carrboro Chamber of Commerce. We think that if we work together and collaborate, we can <br />45 attract the type of local business that will be the right mix for our community. On behalf of the . <br />46 950 members of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, we enthusiastically endorse <br />47 this project. <br />48 <br />49 Jim Stock: I have been sworn in. I am a Carrboro resident. I own a small business that would <br />50 in all likelihood benefit financially from alarge-scale commercial development at Buckhorn, yet I <br />51 am almost appalled that the vision for the future of Orange County is a mall. This is not why we <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.