Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:51:00 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I)I~:~~T l~I~®~J~'~S 3 <br />1 that location about a mile and a half or so. There's a series of residential subdivisions in there <br />2 and these all cluster together around each other. Buckhorn Crossing is one of them, <br />3 Chancellor's Ridge, and Eagle's Point. Looking at all three of those, they are newer in terms of <br />4 age of creation. They are roughly about eight years of age or less, but there are a number of <br />5 sales and re-sales in the development so you can begin to gauge the effect of that location and <br />6 what potential appreciation levels might exist, if any. In the Buckhorn Crossing, over that period <br />7 of time, there was about 4.6%; at Eagle's Point there's about 4%; and Chancellor's Ridge is <br />8 5.3%. Coupling that with the proposed improvements as if 100% complete, I can't find any <br />9 evidence that would indicate that this particular location and the surrounding properties would <br />10 be negatively influenced by the Buckhorn Village developmenfiat all: I'd be glad to take any <br />11 questions. <br />12 <br />13 Bill Hutchins: At this time I'd like to call Jim Parker of Southern Engineering, who is going to <br />14 provide some testimony as to how the developer has addressed some of the concerns raised in <br />15 our last hearing. <br />16 <br />17 Jim Parker: I have been sworn. Just .briefly, we received from the Planning staff after the <br />18 public hearing in February a list of questions from the public that was brought up here and some <br />19 questions that were generated from some committee meetings -the EDC and a few other <br />20 committee meetings within the County and within this area -and we have responded to those, <br />21 and I'd like to submit these as evidence. The staff already has copies of this, but this is just an <br />22 official submittal. <br />23 <br />24 Chair Jacobs: To the staff, could we get a copy of the same list of questions and concerns? <br />25 <br />26 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />27 Charles Bowman: I have been sworn. I have lived in the Buckhorn community all of my life. I <br />28 own 33 acres right beside Petro, I've lived there for 38 years, and I've wondered when this was <br />29 going to happen. l'm looking forward to it happening, and 1 hope the Commissioners take it into <br />30 consideration to pass it because we have nothing on that end of the County; everything is in <br />31 Hillsborough towards the other end of the County, and we need something down on our end. It <br />32 may not be the best thing in the world to happen, but at least it's a start. <br />33 <br />34 Adam Klein: I have been sworn. I am the Director of Government Relations and Economic <br />35 Development for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, and I wanted to talk a little bit <br />36 about Buckhorn Village and sort of the process that the Chamber is going through to review this <br />37 project. In February and March, the Chamber's Board of.Directors and Government .Relations <br />38 Committee reviewed the plan for the proposed Buckhorn Village and both voted unanimously to <br />39 support the project. There are three key, I would say, aspects of this project that both the board <br />40 and the committee particularly would like to bring up tonight. First, is that this project is locating <br />41 in along-identified economic development district. This is land that has been set aside <br />42 specifically for this purpose. There is now a project that's been brought forward that's exactly <br />43 what this zoning is designed for. Second, is the amount of tax revenue that would be generated <br />44 by Buckhorn Village. In the winter, the Chamber contracted with a UNC graduate student to <br />45 basically analyze the economic impact of Buckhorn Village and found pretty strong results. If <br />46 you look at the sales tax revenue from the construction phase to the first year of operation, we <br />47 estimate that this project will'generate somewhere around $6.5 million of taxes for Orange <br />48 County. That number factors out the amount of tax that would go to the State and to other <br />49 counties. In addition to that, we estimate that 1,700 jobs would be created for Orange County <br />50 residents, 2,500 jobs in all. When you consider those numbers in light of the budget situation <br />51 right now, that is much needed revenue with the long-term liability of this County. The third <br />p~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.