Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:51:00 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tl2 <br />Question #25 - l)o you really want to block off neighborhood access? <br />The Buckhorn development team met with the Crestview community and came away <br />with a clear understanding that they object to connectivity. Therefore none has been <br />provided. The intent is to maintain the vegetative buffer and provide a maximum <br />screening effect between the two uses in accordance with the current ordinance. <br />Question #26 -What will this do to the ®zone problem that we already have? <br />See response to Question #32 <br />Question #27 -Where is the cost analysis (i.e. the cost we will bear for serving this <br />site)? <br />County staff to respond <br />~S`tafj`' ~omrn~~et: This report has been completed and is attached for your review and <br />comment. <br />Question #28 - ~4nnexation? Xes,1Vo, lYlaybe, When, etc.? <br />Buckhorn Road Associates will continue to work with Orange County and the City of <br />Mebane in regards to annexation. <br />S'tcaff Cor~a~aent: As a point of clarification, the City of Mebane will be annexing the <br />project at an unspecified time once it can demonstrate that the annexation can legal occur <br />in accordance with the provisions of the North Carolina General Statutes. <br />Question #29 -Why can you not spell out the uses? <br />Specific uses are identified in the current "Draft Conditions of Approval" <br />Question #30 - We need site specific development plans? <br />The intent of the application is to provide site specific plans in accordance with the <br />"Conditions of Approval". This would occur after approval of this application and before <br />any site improvements are allowed. The review process at that time would be by planning <br />staff. The current County ordinance does not require the submittal of these site-specific <br />plans at this time. <br />Question #31 -Impacts on surrounding properties? <br />See the Application package and the April 1, 2008. testimony of Real Estate Appraiser - <br />Vic Knight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.